Originally posted by Dark Black
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Hipster causes murder on a bike
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
He must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostCyclist Charlie Alliston guilty over pedestrian's death - BBC News
Mrs Briggs' family said they plan to campaign for tougher laws to stop pedestrians from texting.
Of course, motorised vehicles still free to kill cyclists e.g. No charges a year after Chris Boardman's mother killed - BBC News
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Comment
-
Manslaughter is a high bar, apparently, and there is no cycling equivalent to causing death by dangerous driving. It's a bit of a gap in the law which needs fixing.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostHe must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Comment
-
FTFYOriginally posted by Dark Black View PostThis message is hidden because Dark Black is pro-rape.


Comment
-
I hope something does come of this. His attitude warrants some kind of serious punishment. I understand that she was on her phone but the appropriate response to someone doing that is to slam on your brakes and avoid a collision.
The whole cyclist argument about 'not wanting to stop' does not apply to public roads. I don't care if you don't want to stop - or the momentum/speed you've built up. If the light goes red, and/or a pedestrian steps into the road you stop - end of..."Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
He had a brake and was not aware his bike was illegal. However he is a complete idiot. He was going to have an accident eventually.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostHe must have had a good lawyer, because in riding a bike he knew had no brakes he was by any reasonable criterion of liability pretty much bang to rights (although I suppose the victim's carelessness in stepping into the road without looking is a slight mitigating factor).
From what little I've heard of the case my impression is the judge thought the same, and probably considered the verdict little short of perverse!
Maybe the judge is a cyclist and so agreed with the verdict?Comment
-
Originally posted by Dark Black View PostThis message is hidden because northernladyuk is on your ignore list.



If only everyone would....Comment
-
Comment
-
You really don't get it do you? The thing is that in London pedestrians are always jumping out in front of bikes, cars, lorries. Cyclists are silent - hopefully soon all vehicles will be electric then pedestrians will have to take more care.Originally posted by Jog On View PostI hope something does come of this. His attitude warrants some kind of serious punishment. I understand that she was on her phone but the appropriate response to someone doing that is to slam on your brakes and avoid a collision.
The whole cyclist argument about 'not wanting to stop' does not apply to public roads. I don't care if you don't want to stop - or the momentum/speed you've built up. If the light goes red, and/or a pedestrian steps into the road you stop - end of...
I also hope something comes of this. Pedestrians stop behaving like lemmings. Crucifixion would be nice.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Today 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Yesterday 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18


Comment