Well, is he?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Is Fred Bloggs thick?
Collapse
X
-
Is Fred Bloggs thick?
6Extremely dense, yes.33.33%2Onlt sometimes, but a bit on the dumb side,i think.16.67%1Nope.16.67%1Can't tell.33.33%2The poll is expired.
Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k. -
-
Comment
-
The case for the prosecution: -
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostSlam dunk for the self employed schemes then?
Likewise for the employed schemes, I assume that the learned gentlemen who consider these things will conclude that sprinkling magic pixie dust on your wages by giving them to someone in the IoM who then lends you the same money back again will conclude that if it still quacks and walks like a duck then the pixie dust hasn't worked?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThe question is where does the liability fall if the magic pixie dust does not work.Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostOn the duck.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostDoes the Duck live in the IoM or in the UK?Originally posted by Dylan View PostDepends who is asking
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostThe duck was given to you in the UK in return for pottering around and doing a few bits and bobs, as you do. But then you sprinkled the pixie dust on it and sent it to the nice man in the IoM who then sent you in return a couple of legs, two breasts, two wings and a carcass back, on loan. Snag is the because the pixie dust didn't work, you still have a duck and ducks are taxed.Originally posted by ChimpMaster View PostI didn't realise this thread was in General.Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostJust search/paste "money" for "duck" eh?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI am going to give now since FB is either a politician or a tax advisor. No straight answers to a straight question.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThey can get money from other employers that used this scheme. But who cares? They have UNLIMITED resources to throw at this. Then are already badly down on NTRT.
Retrospective legislation is quite legal. And even if they weren't, then its the balance outstanding as at 2019 that counts. Of course, the burden falls on the employer(thats the IOM duck for Fred "thicko" bloggs.Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostA little harsh there, I feel, BP.Comment
-
Personally I am upset there was no ban for posting nonsense in professional forums. You cannot answer a straight question.
The type of coder who when called a big pr1ck (which I should think is very frequently) assumes it is composition when inheritance is clearly meant.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Hmmm, good point, fair play there.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostJust to prove how thick he is, no AndyW option.....Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
-
Duck Surprise.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostAnyway, about the duck. Orange sauce or cherry sauce?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Today 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37

Comment