Do we need more (fire) armed police?

[PurpleGorilla]

I think they should all carry, partly for self defence, partly to keep the peace. Non lethal bullets could be used...

[AtW]

I think they should all carry, partly for self defence, partly to keep the peace. Non lethal bullets could be used...

Blanks?

If a lot of police carries guns all the time then they become tempting target for surprise attack and then use their guns.

[PurpleGorilla]

Blanks?

If a lot of police carries guns all the time then they become tempting target for surprise attack and then use their guns.

Rubber bullets.

Yes, they could be a tempting target.

Like the Brit who tried to shoot Trump!

[BrilloPad]

They should all be armed. Then anyone who walks on the cracks in the pavement gets a bullet in the head. For first offence.

[SueEllen]

No way, i know some police officers and I'm not entirely certain they should be trusted with anything more than pepper spray..

You mean they don't have tasers?

[AtW]

They should all be armed. Then anyone who walks on the cracks in the pavement gets a bullet in the head. For first offence.

What about HMRC Inspectors?

And Family Lawyers?

[SueEllen]

What about HMRC Inspectors?

And Family Lawyers?

HMRC inspectors don't need arming to do damage.

Family Lawyers would do better with tasers....

[BrilloPad]

What about HMRC Inspectors?

And Family Lawyers?

Okay. They can be armed.

No arms for squirrels though.

[PurpleGorilla]

What about HMRC Inspectors?

And Family Lawyers?

This is an IR35, the most powerful tax weapon in the world. Do you feel lucky? Do you, punk!

[AtW]

Family Lawyers would do better with tasers....

Not from commercial point of view...