• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Manchester bomber's mother reported him and police did nothing

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I'm the one who asked you twice what "integrate" meant. NWP2C picked up on it because you refused to answer me.

    The fact you refuse to answer me says to me you have an issue with people from the Muslim faith regardless of whether they have integrated or not.
    You have made a false assumption, without any evidence. You are trying to score a point by saying I have issues with Muslims. Based on my comment that Muslim communities have a responsibility to integrate.

    I said in the other comment I'm not going to define integration because it's a basic concept. If you struggle with how communities integrate with each other and the wider world then I can't help you.

    Comment


      Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
      The Eastern Roman empire could have stopped Islam in its tracks in the 600s, but they didn't bother as they were under the mistaken impression it was just another variant of Christianity (which were popping up all over the place at the time in the Middle East and North Africa).

      Talk about dropping a bollock
      Notwithstanding that Great Britain fought alongside the Ottoman Muslims against the Easter Orthodox Church at Constantinople
      "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

      Comment


        Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
        The Eastern Roman empire could have stopped Islam in its tracks in the 600s, but they didn't bother as they were under the mistaken impression it was just another variant of Christianity (which were popping up all over the place at the time in the Middle East and North Africa).

        Talk about dropping a bollock
        I remember reading a theory years ago, that Islam grew from an attempt by the Church to convert the heathen Arabs.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
          Quite sickening how vile some views are on here.....
          None of the "views" I've seen here are anything like as vile as what many thoroughly fed up non-Muslim people in the UK and elsewhere in Europe are doubtless wishing and even plotting.

          We can't just keep burying our head in the sand for ever, and hoping the terrorists will go away, which appears to be the official policy and the only acceptable option to bleeding heart liberals.

          Apart from anything else, if incidents like this continue, one of these days they could directly impact tens of thousands, with a dirty bomb or bioweapon for example, instead of (tragic as it was) a couple of dozen.

          Also, thinking about it, I'm not sure a Frankpledge policy I suggested in an earlier post would be practical these days unless the pill was sugared somehow, because it would :

          * tend to create an "us and them" situation, assuming non-muslims were not obliged to participate, which is not ideal socially and is contrary to the principle that the same law should apply to all

          * give imams, or whoever was the modern equivalent of the tithing-man, more authority in a way thus encouraging Muslims to believe they were policing themselves and would be more entitled to live in the UK under their own Sharia law

          * be hard to argue that tithe members could keep an eye on each other and be mutually accountable, because travel and mobility is so much greater these days, and dwellings more private so who knows what may be going on behind closed doors?

          But at least I was trying to think of a practical and effective (but acceptable) solution, instead of just wringing my hands and uttering the usual pieties.
          Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

          Comment


            Originally posted by diseasex View Post
            I'm saying kick some out.
            Unless I'm mistaken somewhere, the most recent bomber was born in the UK.

            Where are you planning to send them?

            one day at a time

            Comment


              Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View Post
              ... there are hundreds of returnees from Syria who are going scot free & I thought they'd already committed an offence just by virtue of the fact that they'd been to Syria.

              These people definitely need to be swept up - it's crazy having them at large; they've been brutalised and God knows what they're capable of.
              But don't forget a few of those will be MI6 agents, perhaps even more than a few, and the last thing we'd want is to "sweep up" all the genuine bad guys except them or their cover is blown.

              The information they can glean, both in war zones and back in the UK, must be a big asset in our intelligence-related dealings with the US, and in the end that trumps (if you'll pardon the word) everything!
              Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

              Comment


                Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                Also, thinking about it, I'm not sure a Frankpledge policy I suggested in an earlier post would be practical these days unless the pill was sugared somehow, because it would :

                * tend to create an "us and them" situation, assuming non-muslims were not obliged to participate, which is not ideal socially and is contrary to the principle that the same law should apply to all

                * give imams, or whoever was the modern equivalent of the tithing-man, more authority in a way thus encouraging Muslims to believe they were policing themselves and would be more entitled to live in the UK under their own Sharia law

                * be hard to argue that tithe members could keep an eye on each other and be mutually accountable, because travel and mobility is so much greater these days, and dwellings more private so who knows what may be going on behind closed doors?

                But at least I was trying to think of a practical and effective (but acceptable) solution, instead of just wringing my hands and uttering the usual pieties.
                Blimey. Are you OK?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by oscarose View Post
                  Unless I'm mistaken somewhere, the most recent bomber was born in the UK.

                  Where are you planning to send them?

                  I said before. Give them camel and to desert. Strip them out of citizenship first.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
                    I said before. Give them camel and to desert. Strip them out of citizenship first.
                    Are you talking only about people with dual citizenship or are you also talking about people who only have British citizenship? Sorry if this has been covered before - may have missed parts of this thread.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by oscarose View Post
                      Unless I'm mistaken somewhere, the most recent bomber was born in the UK.

                      Where are you planning to send them?

                      Waiting for the response, dog born in a stable doesn't make it a horse from deceasedex

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X