Originally posted by vetran
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The ever loving EU again
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Nah it sounds like all the divorces I know."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR -
sad isn't it?Originally posted by SueEllen View PostNah it sounds like all the divorces I know.
Could be mutual and pleasant if everyone wanted.Comment
-
People are not bargaining chips.Originally posted by GB9 View PostWe are saying we will if they do. That seems sensible and reasonable. To do anything else would put our position and that of UK nationals at a disadvantage. As usual the Remnant case is that we should give in to the all powerful EU. People, trade etc.
Setting a good example is one thing. Being self-righteous is another thing. In no sensible negotiation would you give away part of your bargaining position.
The hitting is coming all from one side whilst the delay to trigger A50 continues. Cameron could have triggered it on June 24th instead of leaving behind a big yellow streak. You're glorious leader failed to deliver at the midnight hour. There is no excuse.Originally posted by GB9 View PostThe reason that posters such as yourself get labelled at Brit haters is because you are bashing our government for defending our position. At no point have you bashed the EU for refusing to discuss the matter. If they want to wait until the A50 trigger then that's fine. But as usual, both sides get hit.
If there was any further evidence 'they' 'them' do not know how the EU works...Originally posted by GB9 View Post
As for countries having the choice, we have constantly seen warnings from the EU that we shouldn't try to split the member states, they should negotiate together, and
that there must be a common position. Strangely, when it suits them, the Commission seems to forget that and tells everyone to do their own thing. Complete hypocrisy.
Thank Heaven we are getting out."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Absolutely and the UK is going to feel a huge EU boot up its backside.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThe EU being the richer party with all the established connections in the relationship has just decided to drag it's feet. It however doesn't mean when they do hire lawyers they won't be a vicious opponent.
I'm alright JackComment
-
Yes they are. It's not nice, but that's not relevant.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostPeople are not bargaining chips.
Comment
-
Doesn't sound very mutual when you simply declare "you are getting it". Sounds a bit rapey to be fair.Originally posted by vetran View Postsad isn't it?
Could be mutual and pleasant if everyone wanted.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Not at all, you just needed shutting up before you started believing your own drivel. Car A and Car B are in an accident. Car A won't share details blah blah blah. Deary me. Even a seven year-old would know to call the police. Haven't you got a window to lick somewhere?Originally posted by scooterscot View PostThe insult. The last hiding place for a lost argument.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
I don't think he could. We've already established that it wouldn't have been constitutionally valid to have done so. There would have been an emergency injuction against him doing so whilst court cases raged on, probably even to the point of the original Article 50 notice having to be revoked, possibly via the ECJ (which would have stoked the more hardened Leavers even more).Originally posted by scooterscot View PostCameron could have triggered it on June 24th
This way, there is no question that having fluffed the original legislation so that it wasn't binding, that any Article 50 notice so invoked will be constitutionally valid.
Besides, Cameruin was too busy staring at the tatters of his presumed future EU career.Taking a break from contractingComment
-
only if you think that way.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostDoesn't sound very mutual when you simply declare "you are getting it". Sounds a bit rapey to be fair.
Comment
-
spot on, pity the bremainers can't see through their grief at losing.Originally posted by chopper View PostI don't think he could. We've already established that it wouldn't have been constitutionally valid to have done so. There would have been an emergency injuction against him doing so whilst court cases raged on, probably even to the point of the original Article 50 notice having to be revoked, possibly via the ECJ (which would have stoked the more hardened Leavers even more).
This way, there is no question that having fluffed the original legislation so that it wasn't binding, that any Article 50 notice so invoked will be constitutionally valid.
Besides, Cameruin was too busy staring at the tatters of his presumed future EU career.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment