Originally posted by AtW
View Post
This is a great thing.
But then someone says "Here is a maximum grass length, and all golf clubs must comply". And then "Here is a mandatory shape of bunker", and "This is what you must offer in your golf club bar menu". Suddenly it feels like we aren't an individual golf club, but rather just part of a chain of harmonised golf clubs.
So we think "What about if we also let America Golf Club and Australia Golf Club members come and play here?" - suddenly, the Euro Golf Club Union says "nope, WE will decide who can play here, not you. You have no say in the matter. All decisions made here, not with the local Golf Club committee that the members elected".
And not only that, we have to pay out to be members of said union, and the money is distributed to some of the other golf clubs.
Sounds like we'd be better off saying "Sod you, we're off out of this, We'd still like a reciprocal arrangement where your golfists can come and play here and our golfists can play there, but shove your political bollocks up your chuff". The gravy train riders at Euro Golf Club Union try to punish Britain Golf Club for daring to go it alone, lest anyone else decides that being able to play golf anywhere is good, but would prefer to be individual clubs rather than a chain of clubs.
The one problem we have is that the 4th Hole has its own committee who has a minority of people who would like to leave Britain Golf Club, and stay in the Euro Golf Club Union, even though to it is better being part of Britain Golf Club rather than being a one hole club in EGCU, being told what to do, including its members not being allowed to socialise with their friends in what is left of Britain Golf Club.
Comment