• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Brexit, Engxit, Wexit or Scexit?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Yes, but you will have forgotten what you did with them.
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
      Yes, but you will have forgotten what you did with them.
      that will be the coke
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
        Do you honestly believe the UK with it's huge debts can seriously afford to lose 250 thousand workers each year ?
        Eh? You have a very vivid imagination. It's quite a leap from what I said to, I presume, your extrapolation of tens of thousands when we're unlikely to have left before 2019 What will be required is evidence of a visa scheme that's going to work, i.e. is properly calibrated. Of course it's going to reduce GDP. Doh! We've been far too focused on absolute GDP and too little on productivity and relative GDP.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
          Eh? You have a very vivid imagination. It's quite a leap from what I said to, I presume, your extrapolation of tens of thousands when we're unlikely to have left before 2019 What will be required is evidence of a visa scheme that's going to work, i.e. is properly calibrated. Of course it's going to reduce GDP. Doh! We've been far too focused on absolute GDP and too little on productivity and relative GDP.
          The "whooshing sound" you may have heard earlier was Mrs May throwing hard Brexit out of the window:

          The Prime Minister signalled that officials are exploring a potential ‘transitional deal’ which could see the UK retain elements of its current relations with the EU after Brexit, while a new trade agreement is hammered out.

          Ms May first hinted at a transitional deal after addressing business groups today, who have raised concerns about the uncertainty brought about by a sudden change in the UK’s relationship with Europe.
          Brexit: Theresa May risks Tory row after suggesting UK may still be tied to EU after 2019 | The Independent

          You don't seriously believe they have a plan do you ?

          ...and why does she have such a scarce resource looking at it if it isn't serious.



          that "transitional deal" she's talking about is a bit like a "temporary workaround" with which we're all so familiar

          Last edited by BlasterBates; 21 November 2016, 18:36.
          I'm alright Jack

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
            The "whooshing sound" you may have heard earlier was Mrs May throwing hard Brexit out of the window
            You should take your own advice and listen very carefully to the actual words used, rather than the spin. It's certainly tremendously amusing to see the press hit overdrive on any morsel of information provided. Did you actually listen to the Q&A session at the CBI? Preventing a cliff edge includes, but is not limited to, informing Parliament and UK businesses about progress, in good time, as the negotiation proceeds. May provided absolutely no concrete suggestion on a particular form of transitional "model", but it's patently obvious that some form of transition will be required, since we'll have ongoing commitments to joint activities that extend far beyond 2019 Again, you have a very vivid imagination. You hear "we want to avoid a cliff edge", and you instantly assume EEA and free movement. Listen more, project less.

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
              You should take your own advice and listen very carefully to the actual words used, rather than the spin. It's certainly tremendously amusing to see the press hit overdrive on any morsel of information provided. Did you actually listen to the Q&A session at the CBI? Preventing a cliff edge includes, but is not limited to, informing Parliament and UK businesses about progress, in good time, as the negotiation proceeds.
              Listen more, project less.
              What would a 'transitional' Brexit deal for the UK be? | The Independent

              The Prime Minister signalled that officials are exploring a potential ‘transitional deal"
              such a deal is widely presumed to involve Britain leaving the EU, as planned, in 2019 but immediately entering a close trading relationship with the rest of the bloc, such as Norway has as part of the European Economic Area [EEA].
              Last edited by BlasterBates; 21 November 2016, 21:34.
              I'm alright Jack

              Comment


                #67
                Fiendishly difficult. Fiendishly. Oh well. Of course, if they'd like to provide us with complete control over EU migration during the transition period, the Tory grassroots and most of the voters keeping May in office might be willing to listen. Then again...

                Comment


                  #68
                  Would you care to edit that post any more times? I think you've covered most variations of possible content and L&F, barring, perhaps, the Iliad.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
                    Fiendishly difficult. Fiendishly. Oh well. Of course, if they'd like to provide us with complete control over EU migration during the transition period, the Tory grassroots and most of the voters keeping May in office might be willing to listen. Then again...
                    and who are they going to vote for ?

                    UKIP

                    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...-a7430456.html

                    This should be reasonably straightforward since the institution of the EEA already exists and the UK would not have to invent it from scratch.

                    This arrangement might last for a set period of time, perhaps a couple of years.

                    Such a transition plan was recommended by the think tank Open Europe in August.

                    Raoul Ruparel, the former head of Open Europe, is, perhaps significantly, now an adviser to the Brexit Secretary, David Davis.
                    Last edited by BlasterBates; 21 November 2016, 21:52.
                    I'm alright Jack

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                      I love tabloid journalism.

                      Despite the Government detailing hundreds of times that we don't intend to fit an existing model, they keep churning it out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X