Originally posted by meridian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Snowflake burning in hell...
Collapse
X
-
-
Then go in the booth and write "I decline to vote because I think they are all a bunch of muppets" if enough do that it will become news. Remember they read the spoiled ballot paper numbers in the result.Originally posted by meridian View PostWhen faced with a choice between Clinton and Trump, I wouldn't want to vote for eitherComment
-
Except that was not the choice.....Originally posted by meridian View PostWhen faced with a choice between Clinton and Trump, I wouldn't want to vote for eitherComment
-
Compulsory voting should be brought in, but with the caveat that there is a “none of the above” choice which would cause a coalition of the major vote winnersGrowing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
-
Seen that recent interview with Clinton? Sans the full make up and presumably off the drugs now. jeez looks about 90.
Comment
-
yes because 51% of people can vote to take away the rights of the 49%Originally posted by d000hg View PostDirect democracy is a bad idea.
works better when you have a constitutional republic that protects everyone's rights first and foremost after that I don't think direct democracy is a bad idea at all, especially in this day and age when information is universally available and voting should be easier and quicker than ever
we can seriously cut back on the "representatives" tooComment
-
I disagree. Even with the caveat, (which I DO agree with).Originally posted by Halo Jones View PostCompulsory voting should be brought in, but with the caveat that there is a “none of the above” choice which would cause a coalition of the major vote winners
As soon as you make something compulsory then you start to erode freedom of choice.
Nobody died so that we should HAVE to vote, they died for our right to choose whether or not we WISH to vote.“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Interesting article here:
2016-06-04 Generation Snowflake - How we train our kids to be censorious cry babiesWork in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Yes indeed......Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostInteresting article here:
2016-06-04 Generation Snowflake - How we train our kids to be censorious cry babies
But not all of us do.
Yet those of us who don't are sneered at by the virtue signalling lefties to a point where it is possible to loose you job or end up in court if you have the wrong opinion.Comment
-
But in the case of brexit it's bloody well known what your constituents delegated view is because it was counted and weighed. That labour tulips only honest option would be to say I'm sorry my views are out of touch with my constituents I'm stepping down on a point of conscience I leave them to vote someone in to deliver their will. But his nose is too far in the troughOriginally posted by SueEllen View PostAnother person who doesn't understand how the political system works in the UK.
A MP or any politician on a party ticket is there to represent their party first so needs to follow the party line unless it is a free vote. If they don't, on the rare occasions they need to protest against government policy they will not be able to gain the support, respect and help of their political colleagues both in their own party and across party to change government policy.
This is one of the reasons Corbyn has difficulties with Labour MPs in his own party as he's rebelled too much under other Labour leaders.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment