Originally posted by The Spartan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Bring back NLUK!
Collapse
X
-
The ironic thing was he had discussed this exact situation a few months ago. He got similar responses then.The Chunt of Chunts. -
NLUK has contacted me and ask me to say.....
That one was a bit harsh. I pointed out it was another question where the OP knows the answer but is looking for forum approval. We get loads of them so to make a sarky comment to that is hardly personal abuse. He said he knows the rules, he said he'd been offered 3 months. That was the end of it. All the trying to fudge it posts were pointless.
I also posted a ton of links to show him why his thinking was wrong. Not like I just jumped in and abused him.
I do think that's a totally unfair ban but I've put myself in a position where the slightest foot out of line is going to attract attention so can't really complain.
Nice to know that posting ill thought out brain farts with the answer in the first post is still allowed in the Prof forums though
Comment
-
We all believe thatOriginally posted by NCOTBAC View PostNLUK has contacted me and ask me to say.....
Comment
-
I believe NAT saw Cojak had locked it, didn't read it all, then wielded the ban hammer anyway.
Bad moderation, IMO.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
You would think PC does already know the answer given how many posts he's made since he joined CUKIn Scooter we trust
Comment
-
To be fair a little harsh but wouldn't go as far as to say bad. I hardly did what NAT suggests, particularly bearing in mind the effort with the links.. but as I said. Too much history to blame himOriginally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostI believe NAT saw Cojak had locked it, didn't read it all, then wielded the ban hammer anyway.
Bad moderation, IMO.
Anyway. It is what it is.NLUK, 2 days for <handbags> with psychocandy in the professional forums.Comment
-
Originally posted by NCOTBAC View PostNLUK has contacted me and ask me to say.....
That one was a bit harsh. I pointed out it was another question where the OP knows the answer but is looking for forum approval. We get loads of them so to make a sarky comment to that is hardly personal abuse. He said he knows the rules, he said he'd been offered 3 months. That was the end of it. All the trying to fudge it posts were pointless.
I also posted a ton of links to show him why his thinking was wrong. Not like I just jumped in and abused him.
I do think that's a totally unfair ban but I've put myself in a position where the slightest foot out of line is going to attract attention so can't really complain.
Nice to know that posting ill thought out brain farts with the answer in the first post is still allowed in the Prof forums though
So, not only has NLUK contacted you, he's taken over your login.Originally posted by NCOTBAC View PostTo be fair a little harsh but wouldn't go as far as to say bad. I hardly did what NAT suggests, particularly bearing in mind the effort with the links.. but as I said. Too much history to blame him
Anyway. It is what it is.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Goddamit... I'm crap at this sockie marlarkyOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostSo, not only has NLUK contacted you, he's taken over your login.
Comment
-
Comment
-
You should have asked your accountant for advice first...Originally posted by NCOTBAC View PostGoddamit... I'm crap at this sockie marlarky

Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment