- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The HMRC 1 Million Pound Refund Man
Collapse
X
-
-
"HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "
How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started? -
They said Year, so I'm guessing he tried to state prior tax year, in the same yearOriginally posted by AtW View Post"HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "
How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started?
.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Because the tax year started on April 6th, 2010?Originally posted by AtW View Post"HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "
How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started?Comment
-
"The actor is objecting to a decision by tax inspectors to prevent him extending the end-date of one set of accounts from 31 July 2009 to 5 April 2010 — the eve of the new tax year in which a 50% top rate of tax came into force. "Originally posted by Platypus View PostBecause the tax year started on April 6th, 2010?
I don't understand why that would matter for personal taxation where financial year is fixed anyway. He's obviously tried to gain tax advantage since £1 mln at stake, might have to ask my accountant ...Comment
-
Where the feck is NLUK when you really need himOriginally posted by AtW View Post"The actor is objecting to a decision by tax inspectors to prevent him extending the end-date of one set of accounts from 31 July 2009 to 5 April 2010 — the eve of the new tax year in which a 50% top rate of tax came into force. "
I don't understand why that would matter for personal taxation where financial year is fixed anyway. He's obviously tried to gain tax advantage since £1 mln at stake, might have to ask my accountant ...
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Thats not a scenario we've ever encounteredOriginally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostWhere the feck is NLUK when you really need him
Comment
-
Well, extraordinary circumstances, there's a thespian involvedOriginally posted by barrydidit View PostThats not a scenario we've ever encountered
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
It's all a load of Hufflepuff.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Fair point. I've met him and can say with confidence he knows a lot about thespianism.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostWell, extraordinary circumstances, there's a thespian involved
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment