• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The HMRC 1 Million Pound Refund Man"

Collapse

  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    FTFY

    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Nonsense. Think like a, pure bred, Yorkshire version of Lawrence Llewelyn-Bowen.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    FTFY
    Nonsense. Think Lawrence Llewelyn-Bowen.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    FTFY

    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Fair point. I've met him and can say with confidence he is a Jedi Master or, at the very least, Karate Kid status when it comes to thespianism.

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Well, extraordinary circumstances, there's a thespian involved
    Fair point. I've met him and can say with confidence he knows a lot about thespianism.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    It's all a load of Hufflepuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    Thats not a scenario we've ever encountered
    Well, extraordinary circumstances, there's a thespian involved

    Leave a comment:


  • barrydidit
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Where the feck is NLUK when you really need him
    Thats not a scenario we've ever encountered

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    "The actor is objecting to a decision by tax inspectors to prevent him extending the end-date of one set of accounts from 31 July 2009 to 5 April 2010 — the eve of the new tax year in which a 50% top rate of tax came into force. "

    I don't understand why that would matter for personal taxation where financial year is fixed anyway. He's obviously tried to gain tax advantage since £1 mln at stake, might have to ask my accountant ...
    Where the feck is NLUK when you really need him

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Because the tax year started on April 6th, 2010?
    "The actor is objecting to a decision by tax inspectors to prevent him extending the end-date of one set of accounts from 31 July 2009 to 5 April 2010 — the eve of the new tax year in which a 50% top rate of tax came into force. "

    I don't understand why that would matter for personal taxation where financial year is fixed anyway. He's obviously tried to gain tax advantage since £1 mln at stake, might have to ask my accountant ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    "HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "

    How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started?
    Because the tax year started on April 6th, 2010?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    "HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "

    How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started?
    They said Year, so I'm guessing he tried to state prior tax year, in the same year .

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "HMRC is disputing Grint’s choice of accounting date and had rejected the actor’s attempt to select 5 April 2010, the year that a 50% top rate of tax was introduced. "

    How did that help him reduce tax bill, if he picked period when 50% tax started?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    started a topic The HMRC 1 Million Pound Refund Man

    The HMRC 1 Million Pound Refund Man

    Should he have gone the LTD Company route ?

    https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...y-potter-films

Working...
X