Originally posted by MrMarkyMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
transfering profits offshore
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by diseasex View PostIf everyone does it , why don't we?
wealthy getting wealthier, whereas we are working our asses off
google, starbucks or cameron's father to name a few
Um...
1. We are (relatively speaking) wealthy.
2. We are (relatively speaking) not working our asses off.
3. We are (relatively speaking) paying less tax than if we were employees.
So, stop feeling so hard done by. Think of how much you earned back in your home country. Think about how many BMW M5s you could have bought back then. Now you've got more money you're getting greedy very quickly. Stop it. It's not big and it's not clever.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Yes, probably legal(ish). The trick is to get the money back again without incurring any tax on it personally.Originally posted by diseasex View PostYeah just freaking invoice your english consultancy some fees and you have money transfered which is LEGAL... Not news , i know, just pissed that everyone does it and not me because I don't want headache.Comment
-
A bit of a myth, that big co's just "get away with it", i.e. HMRC just turn a blind eye.
http://www.taxjournal.com/tj/article...ments-26112015
Big corporations are taken through the mill. They can however afford very expensive lawyers.
You can do what Google do, but first you need a valuable marketing trademark worth a lot of money. What Google and Starbucks do is put their Marketing assets in an offshore company. They then charge out the marketing rights to the UK company.
If you could turn up to customers and say "I'm Google" and you have all the rights to sell all their products, you'd make a lot of money yep? and therefore you'd pay through the nose to get those marketing rights.
How would you value your marketing assets of your company "diseasex Ltd" ? my estimation would be that it is probably worthless in that respect.
What you need to do is make a huge name for yourself first, then you can setup an offshore company and charge out.I'm alright JackComment
-
But an IoM company can invoice a UK company, and the UK company can invoice the agency - just adds a bigger consultancy chainOriginally posted by SimonMac View PostNo UK agent will work with an IOM Ltd company so that kinda rules out that planComment
-
Putin bought shares and withdrew from the deal , Which incurred high fees. I'm sure there are other examplesOriginally posted by BlasterBates View PostA bit of a myth, that big co's just "get away with it", i.e. HMRC just turn a blind eye.
http://www.taxjournal.com/tj/article...ments-26112015
Big corporations are taken through the mill. They can however afford very expensive lawyers.
You can do what Google do, but first you need a valuable marketing trademark worth a lot of money. What Google and Starbucks do is put their Marketing assets in an offshore company. They then charge out the marketing rights to the UK company.
If you could turn up to customers and say "I'm Google" and you have all the rights to sell all their products, you'd make a lot of money yep? and therefore you'd pay through the nose to get those marketing rights.
How would you value your marketing assets of your company "diseasex Ltd" ? my estimation would be that it is probably worthless in that respect.
What you need to do is make a huge name for yourself first, then you can setup an offshore company and charge out.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment