Whatever Happened to Tyke Merc?

[MrMarkyMark]

Always second eh? Even with PC and suity around?
Well done on winning Wankpuffin of the Week.

The question on everyone's lips is, how much in Amazon vouchers does he get for that?

[TykeMerc]

I appreciate the thought, but nothing has happened to me. I just don't bother posting here any more, in fact I wouldn't have bothered now except NAT decided to take it upon himself to lie so blatantly.

He was asked several times not to out people he thought were sockies, instead inform the moderators. He complied for a while, then insisted certain posters were sockies, in the professional forums, even though we had plenty of evidence that proved they were real posters. For obvious reasons we cannot share that evidence with members.

He got a short ban for continuing to out such people, and flounced.

The simple fact that someone posts dribble is not evidence that they're sockies. They could simply be thick.

Apparently you have such a deficit of personal integrity that you felt the need to fabricate a pile of utter bollocks, one can only assume as a way to boost your self worth for some bizarre reason.

The sockpuppet issue is long gone since you finally admitted that they were officially sanctioned (which makes a mockery of all the bannings for sockpuppetry) and not a violation of the forum rules, as has been seen by the vanishingly small number of remaining long time posters your protestations of outed sockies being real have been disproved so many times that making them again just makes you appear even more ludicrous than before. The reporting process gained zero traction as was proven repeatedly, it was just an attempted smokescreen to cover the fact that CUK would have terminally reduced traffic with the sockies shut down.
Incidentally I have never posted under a sockpuppet ID, I have never even created one, I know Cojak attempted a humorous entry into the bannings thread supported by NATzi, but it was either a joke or a mistake (not that I'd consider it another of NATzi's lies).

As to bans, I was banned on 2 or 3 occasions for being "mean" to a poster who felt the need to post endless sad sack and fictional stories about his fantasy existence and failed contracts, no bans were for posts about outing sockpuppets (most of which have since been banned as sockpuppets).
The only other ban I received (the last one before the terminal one that NAT is likely to hand out for this post) was for pointing out that NAT who has recently been termed NATzi by someone else moderated in the style of Eric Cartman with his obsession of Authoritah. He proved it so deeply by deleting and editing posts criticising him and he's even replayed the behaviour in the last few weeks. I was banned as a "troll" for pointing out his Cartmanesque tactics. I've never "flounced" come to that, I simply didn't bother to come back after the last ban.

Incidentally NATzi since you have a particular anti racism agenda and ruthlessly attack anyone implying any type of fault with persons of a certain abrahamic faith and/or dusky skin nature you may want to think about the fact that you've completely ignored the recent use of 2 racist words starting with K. One of which is a massive racial insult to people of the Jewish faith and the other is the equivalent of using the name of Guy Gibsons Labrador if uttered by an Afrikaaner. If you're going to have a fake anti racist agenda apply it in a less hypocritical manner, admittedly that would mean you would have to ban NickFitz since he posted them.

[LondonManc]

You can't have a flounce without an announce. Unwritten rule of forums. Otherwise you simply drift away rather than flounce.

[Unix]

I appreciate the thought, but nothing has happened to me. I just don't bother posting here any more, in fact I wouldn't have bothered now except NAT decided to take it upon himself to lie so blatantly.



Apparently you have such a deficit of personal integrity that you felt the need to fabricate a pile of utter bollocks, one can only assume as a way to boost your self worth for some bizarre reason.

The sockpuppet issue is long gone since you finally admitted that they were officially sanctioned (which makes a mockery of all the bannings for sockpuppetry) and not a violation of the forum rules, as has been seen by the vanishingly small number of remaining long time posters your protestations of outed sockies being real have been disproved so many times that making them again just makes you appear even more ludicrous than before. The reporting process gained zero traction as was proven repeatedly, it was just an attempted smokescreen to cover the fact that CUK would have terminally reduced traffic with the sockies shut down.
Incidentally I have never posted under a sockpuppet ID, I have never even created one, I know Cojak attempted a humorous entry into the bannings thread supported by NATzi, but it was either a joke or a mistake (not that I'd consider it another of NATzi's lies).

As to bans, I was banned on 2 or 3 occasions for being "mean" to a poster who felt the need to post endless sad sack and fictional stories about his fantasy existence and failed contracts, no bans were for posts about outing sockpuppets (most of which have since been banned as sockpuppets).
The only other ban I received (the last one before the terminal one that NAT is likely to hand out for this post) was for pointing out that NAT who has recently been termed NATzi by someone else moderated in the style of Eric Cartman with his obsession of Authoritah. He proved it so deeply by deleting and editing posts criticising him and he's even replayed the behaviour in the last few weeks. I was banned as a "troll" for pointing out his Cartmanesque tactics. I've never "flounced" come to that, I simply didn't bother to come back after the last ban.

Incidentally NATzi since you have a particular anti racism agenda and ruthlessly attack anyone implying any type of fault with persons of a certain abrahamic faith and/or dusky skin nature you may want to think about the fact that you've completely ignored the recent use of 2 racist words starting with K. One of which is a massive racial insult to people of the Jewish faith and the other is the equivalent of using the name of Guy Gibsons Labrador if uttered by an Afrikaaner. If you're going to have a fake anti racist agenda apply it in a less hypocritical manner, admittedly that would mean you would have to ban NickFitz since he posted them.

[NickFitz]

Incidentally NATzi since you have a particular anti racism agenda and ruthlessly attack anyone implying any type of fault with persons of a certain abrahamic faith and/or dusky skin nature you may want to think about the fact that you've completely ignored the recent use of 2 racist words starting with K. One of which is a massive racial insult to people of the Jewish faith and the other is the equivalent of using the name of Guy Gibsons Labrador if uttered by an Afrikaaner. If you're going to have a fake anti racist agenda apply it in a less hypocritical manner, admittedly that would mean you would have to ban NickFitz since he posted them.

Use–mention distinction

[AtW]

it was just an attempted smokescreen to cover the fact that CUK would have terminally reduced traffic with the sockies shut down.

The truth is out!!!

[LondonManc]

Use–mention distinction

See you in a week, Nick "Collateral Damage" Fitz.

[northernladuk]

Use–mention distinction

Resistance is futile.

[NickFitz]

Resistance is futile.

Whereas "resistance" is not "futile"

[northernladuk]

Whereas "resistance" is not "futile"

Mods..... Hurry up with this ban. He's making me look thick again.