• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Most tax efficient salary for 2016-17

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    It's hardly a "punishment" - the EA was intended to encourage companies to take on employees, not for one man contractor limited companies to get a tax break.
    If it affects me negatively, it's a punishment, regardless of how it's tarted up. I'm sure the divvy tax increase isn't a punishment either, it's to holisticly morph competitive thinking while fungibly disintermediating efficient functionalities or some other mumbojumbo!

    Like my first permie gig that gave everyone a £500 bonus if they took no sick days, and -£50 for each sick day taken as an incentive. Everyone viewed it as a punishment/paycut for being sick and would perpetuate the flu-pit ideology mentioned in the other thread.
    Unless you're the lead dog, the scenery never changes.

    Currently 10+ contracts available in your area

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by NibblyPig View Post
      If it affects me negatively, it's a punishment, regardless of how it's tarted up. I'm sure the divvy tax increase isn't a punishment either, it's to holisticly morph competitive thinking while fungibly disintermediating efficient functionalities or some other mumbojumbo!

      Like my first permie gig that gave everyone a £500 bonus if they took no sick days, and -£50 for each sick day taken as an incentive. Everyone viewed it as a punishment/paycut for being sick and would perpetuate the flu-pit ideology mentioned in the other thread.
      But it doesn't affect you.

      It's a particularly narrow view that the removal of a benefit that you were never intended to have is an unfair punishment, but if that's your view then that's your view.
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
        You can, and there would be no further tax to pay; but you will already have been taxed at 20% Corp Tax on your dividends, so this is not the most efficient way to take the money.

        Your accountant should be able to talk you through this stuff. You do have an accountant, don't you?
        Yes but they're crap!

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by smileyface View Post
          Yes but they're crap!
          So why not switch to one who isn't?

          Comment


            #15
            So what are the most tax efficient salaries to pay myself and my secretary/admin ?

            If I increased my salary would this increase my take home pay? I would be paying income tax and NI but then I will be paying less corporation tax and also less dividends to be paid at the 7.5% basic tax rate.
            Last edited by Newbie Simon; 10 March 2016, 22:36.

            Comment


              #16
              Stealing this for my Linkedin:

              Originally posted by NibblyPig View Post
              ... it's to holisticly morph competitive thinking while fungibly disintermediating efficient functionalities
              On topic, had a recent discussion with the accountant. She pointed out that one might choose 8k figure, 11k or even 13k (the living wage). She says there isn't that much difference in the tax efficiency, and that bigger sums are more "commercial", ie. look more realistic to Hector. I'll plop for 11 or 13.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by unixman View Post
                Stealing this for my Linkedin:



                On topic, had a recent discussion with the accountant. She pointed out that one might choose 8k figure, 11k or even 13k (the living wage). She says there isn't that much difference in the tax efficiency, and that bigger sums are more "commercial", ie. look more realistic to Hector. I'll plop for 11 or 13.
                Yeah, right, 11k is "commercial" on a turnover ~10x that amount

                Commercial is what makes sense, not what it looks like.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
                  Yeah, right, 11k is "commercial" on a turnover ~10x that amount

                  Commercial is what makes sense, not what it looks like.
                  You have doubled my turnover at a stroke. Be my accountant! Help me put a Mustang V8 through under "sundries".

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by unixman View Post
                    You have doubled my turnover at a stroke. Be my accountant! Help me put a Mustang V8 through under "sundries".
                    No need, buy it as an asset and use it as a company car.
                    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by unixman View Post
                      You have doubled my turnover at a stroke. Be my accountant! Help me put a Mustang V8 through under "sundries".
                      Here you are you can have a virtual one, mine, well maybe not the car you wanted but it does have a 4.6L V8 derived from a 2004 Mustang GT + blower - 400BHP without traction control is quite entertaining.

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccEccPZAr7A
                      So now I am worried, am I being deceived, just how much sugar is really in a spoon full!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X