Originally posted by MicrosoftBob
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Suity and Suity02 back to being Luton's #1 Couple
Collapse
X
-
The horse came out eventually then?The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist -
Yup there goes the neighhhhhhbourhoodOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostThe horse came out eventually then?Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
No, there's case law: You can insult a police officer like that in the UK, provided you don't raise your voice.
An insult with a raised voice can be construed as an assault (which doesn't have to involve a physical assault, only the reasonable fear that one is imminent).Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Unless you're taller than the police officer when the mere act of being visible to them will be construed as threatening behaviour should they want to arrest youOriginally posted by OwlHoot View PostNo, there's case law: You can insult a police officer like that in the UK, provided you don't raise your voice.
An insult with a raised voice can be construed as an assault (which doesn't have to involve a physical assault, only the reasonable fear that one is imminent).Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Good job we live in a democracy.
Yeh right.Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
-
Fail. Doesn't answer whether they took the uniform off that lady.Originally posted by SimonMac View Post
I'd do her.
Comment
-
-
The queue starts on the right....Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostI'd do her.
Would you shag Jayda Fransen of Britain First? | Army Rumour ServiceComment
-
looks like one of the exes except she had slightly smaller assets. She did make up for it with enthusiasm.Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostHere you go lad:
Were it not for her politics & accent I would.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Today 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Yesterday 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59


Comment