Originally posted by meridian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dispatches: Taxing The Rich
Collapse
X
-
-
-
"Osborne received a dividend worth £1,200, paid in 2014"Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
That's not even worth talking about.Comment
-
Not surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
His family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostNot surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Something isn't right here...Comment
-
True, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyOriginally posted by AtW View PostHis family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.
Something isn't right here...Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
I reckon taxes would be lower under this tough but fair regime - the penalties for non-payment however will be appropriate...Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostTrue, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyComment
-
Comment
-
Private Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.£400k in in dividends,
Full story with discussionComment
-
What I noticed is that their company was loss making and now made tiny profit (£720k), yet highest paid director (allegedly Sir Peter) got paid £684k!Originally posted by NigelJK View PostPrivate Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Today 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Yesterday 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42

Comment