Originally posted by meridian
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Dispatches: Taxing The Rich
Collapse
X
-
-
-
"Osborne received a dividend worth £1,200, paid in 2014"Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
That's not even worth talking about.Comment
-
Not surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
His family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostNot surprised he doesn't make much out of the family firm. I mean who uses wallpaper these days? It's like owning a carriage lamp factory.
Something isn't right here...Comment
-
True, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyOriginally posted by AtW View PostHis family's business paid less than £400k in in dividends, yet Gidiot considers himself experienced enough to run UKs economy.
Something isn't right here...Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
I reckon taxes would be lower under this tough but fair regime - the penalties for non-payment however will be appropriate...Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostTrue, but better than letting Labour in and have the IRA run the UK economyComment
-
Comment
-
Private Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.£400k in in dividends,
Full story with discussionComment
-
What I noticed is that their company was loss making and now made tiny profit (£720k), yet highest paid director (allegedly Sir Peter) got paid £684k!Originally posted by NigelJK View PostPrivate Eye did a thing on the company. They pay very little tax on their multi-million turnover. The implication being that it's OK for Ozzy to 'avoid' tax but not the rest of us.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Today 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Yesterday 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Yesterday 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08

Comment