- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why spelling is important...
Collapse
X
-
-
His parents are moaning that the police got involved. Everyone else would be moaning if the police hadn't got involved.
What a bloody mess we're in. -
Waste of police time. Social services would be more appropriate for a child being forced to live in a terraced house.
Comment
-
It is an overreaction if they didn't bother to speak to the boy and a couple of others about their "interesting" stories before calling the police. I bet if they had the boy would have said terraced.
It's like with abuse claims - teachers check with the child before speaking to the head."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Mrs Admin has gone back to teaching after a ten year hiatus and she mentioned this terrorist act snooping they have to do. On the one hand it seems a bit big brother. On the other hand the security forces are jumpy and need intel. Collateral damage unfortunately. At least he didn't try to escape from them down to the tube station. We know how dangerous that can be.Comment
-
It's like a joke from a Carry On film.
"wot did 'ee write?? Terrorist??! He lives in a 'terrorist house', call the coppers luv"Comment
-
Originally posted by barrydidit View PostWaste of police time. Social services would be more appropriate for a child being forced to live in a terraced house.
You would have thought living in Accrington would be punishment enough.The boy, who lives in Accrington in Lancashire
IMO, they should have locked him up, therefore, preventing any possibility of anything happening in future.
Last edited by MrMarkyMark; 20 January 2016, 09:17.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
It's not really a spelling error. A spelling error would be terracced or teracced house. It's a using completely the wrong word error; it seems a lot more likely he did it deliberately as a joke.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
He's 10. It's not unusual for kids that age to come up with such malapropisms.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIt's not really a spelling error. A spelling error would be terracced or teracced house. It's a using completely the wrong word error; it seems a lot more likely he did it deliberately as a joke.Comment
-
One does wonder what he actually wrote - terrorist, or something like terrist?Originally posted by VectraMan View PostIt's not really a spelling error. A spelling error would be terracced or teracced house. It's a using completely the wrong word error; it seems a lot more likely he did it deliberately as a joke.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58


Comment