Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Tories have 'killed buy-to-let for the middle-classes'
Either way, 225k is 4X combined income which is quite high.
And it's £1000/month with interest rates at .5%. What happens when they bounce back to 2%?
What happens when they have kids and the mum takes time off work?
what happens when the value of money falls and £225k is the annual wage?
Our first house 25 years ago was 3.5 times joint wage. We ate beans a lot! The Mortgage at the time was £400->500 in the first few years. We waited until we could afford kids.
what happens when the value of money falls and £225k is the annual wage?
Our first house 25 years ago was 3.5 times joint wage. We ate beans a lot! The Mortgage at the time was £400->500 in the first few years. We waited until we could afford kids.
Immigrants and benefit scroungers do the breeding, the middle classes are supposed to pay for it all.
what happens when the value of money falls and £225k is the annual wage?
Our first house 25 years ago was 3.5 times joint wage. We ate beans a lot! The Mortgage at the time was £400->500 in the first few years. We waited until we could afford kids.
Interest rates are likely to rise, young couples are likely to want kids.
If you're both on average salaries there's no guarantee that you'll ever earn much more than that, and you won't pay off your mortgage until you're ~65.
Either you guys were earning little, or you deliberately bought an expensive house surely. I didn't even think they used to offer mortgages based on combined income back then, more like 3X + 1X or something? Or was that an interim thing in between then and now?
Love the condescending selfie stick crap. People fortunate to buy in early 80s and 90s have the gall to say pick up the expensive crumbs and shut the **** up.
**** off.
As to no young voting. That's because THERE IS NO ONE TO VOTE FOR!
I always find myself straddling two sides on this argument. On the on hand, it is absolutely bad govt policy from all angles that has led to the housing Ponzi scheme that has priced many younger people out of housing. On the other hand, seeing all the clueless blaming of landlords and the idiotic expectations of some people, my sympathy wanes.
Future governments are going to have a huge problem on their hands, when they can no longer bribe homeowners and have taxed wealth producers out of all existence, in their hubristic assumption that Britain is so special that these individuals and firms won't eventually just pack up and leave, with a potential market of 6b consumers.
Either you guys were earning little, or you deliberately bought an expensive house surely. I didn't even think they used to offer mortgages based on combined income back then, more like 3X + 1X or something? Or was that an interim thing in between then and now?
We bought the best house we could afford, we fixed our repayments for 5 years. When it became difficult we scrimped what we could.
We have repeated for each house purchase since. Still won't repay until I'm 65 but our mortgage is pretty small and LTV the same.
I always find myself straddling two sides on this argument. On the on hand, it is absolutely bad govt policy from all angles that has led to the housing Ponzi scheme that has priced many younger people out of housing. On the other hand, seeing all the clueless blaming of landlords and the idiotic expectations of some people, my sympathy wanes.
.
+1
sooner they grasp the nettle & solve it the better.
On the other hand, seeing all the clueless blaming of landlords and the idiotic expectations of some people, my sympathy wanes.
Future governments are going to have a huge problem on their hands, when they can no longer bribe homeowners and have taxed wealth producers out of all existence, in their hubristic assumption that Britain is so special that these individuals and firms won't eventually just pack up and leave, with a potential market of 6b consumers.
Correct, how can the people that took advantage of what was on offer be to blame.
Agreed, a huge problem and the longer it goes on, the worse it will end.
Comment