• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Muslims and terrorism, do they just accept it?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Says it all really:



    very appropriate.

    Comment


      #82
      Originally posted by NorthWestPerm2Contr View Post
      Capish?
      Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
      Capish!
      Capisce, capiche or even possibly capisci - Shirley! (sic)

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
        I haven't said anything about killing anyone, except perhaps the odd very high priority target like JJ. Policing and killing are two different things.

        If you scroll back you will see we share the same views on investment to prevent radicalisation. I also suggest amending the criminal record process.

        You may also have noticed, if you weren't so blinkered in your enthusiasm to criticise that I am very pro UN, and very anti BBC.
        Apart from calling for 10 million troops on the ground? You really think thats not going to end up in one god almighty cluster**** of death and destruction?

        Here's a clue. Soldiers are not trained to be policemen, they are trained to kill people. And when the people they have been sent to police object to that, thats what they will do, because thats all they know how to do. And it will go downhill from there, very, very fast.
        "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by DaveB View Post
          Apart from calling for 10 million troops on the ground? You really think thats not going to end up in one god almighty cluster**** of death and destruction?

          Here's a clue. Soldiers are not trained to be policemen, they are trained to kill people. And when the people they have been sent to police object to that, thats what they will do, because thats all they know how to do. And it will go downhill from there, very, very fast.

          It's not fair to send soldiers to a war where there aren't clear objectives. At the moment any involvement in Syria would mean bombing one side then switching over and bombing another.
          "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

          Comment


            #85
            Muslims and terrorism, do they just accept it?

            Originally posted by DaveB View Post
            Apart from calling for 10 million troops on the ground? You really think thats not going to end up in one god almighty cluster**** of death and destruction?

            Here's a clue. Soldiers are not trained to be policemen, they are trained to kill people. And when the people they have been sent to police object to that, thats what they will do, because thats all they know how to do. And it will go downhill from there, very, very fast.
            You've never heard of UN peacekeepers then?







            Only boots on the ground can deliver peace. And a UN mandate is the best mandate we can give.

            Needs clear goals though, not just witnesses, but peace enforcement. If needs be through force.

            http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/op...ekeeping.shtml


            Why 10 million? Well let's not mince around. This number would put peacekeepers in every village and on every road.
            Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 18 November 2015, 21:33.
            http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

            Comment


              #86
              I used to live in an extremely nationalist area of the North of Ireland. They had tens of thousands of soldiers trying to cope with half a million Catholics and they still couldn't stop Docklands and Manchester getting utterly fooked and a thousand soldiers and police being killed.

              All that was asked for was "one man one vote" and there was a war for that. In the UK.

              A few thing I learned from that is that when you live in a community and there is an army of occupation people get kind of ****ed off. Putting your bins out and a soldier is in your garden telling to you **** of fenian you don't really care if he gets his legs blown off later, and they often did. Secondly community and resolve gets stronger under undeserved oppression.

              But then nobody stoned women if the got raped, nobody cut of heads for aldultery, nobody cut off hand in the name of religion.

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                But then nobody stoned women if the got raped, nobody cut of heads for aldultery, nobody cut off hand in the name of religion.
                No, the provo preferred knee-capping
                I'm a smug bastard.

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
                  You've never heard of UN peacekeepers then

                  What is peacekeeping? United Nations Peacekeeping


                  Why 10 million? Well let's not mince around. This number would put peacekeepers in every village and on every road.
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Srebrenica_massacre

                  Yes, we have heard of the UN peacekeepers.

                  The Dutch UN soldiers left Srebrenica and the Serbians moved in, dug trenches and shot 9000 Bosnians into them. In 95. In Europe.

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by LucidDementia View Post
                    Indeed.

                    Enforce our cultural values on them because we're right and they're wrong.

                    So, same old same old really.
                    They are wrong. Objectively speaking.
                    Force it? Only if it's necessary for our own safety.
                    Ostracise them until they become civilised? Sure.

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                      It's not fair to send soldiers to a war where there aren't clear objectives. At the moment any involvement in Syria would mean bombing one side then switching over and bombing another.
                      In Syria they need to do whatever is needed to give the country back to Assad. Aint gonna happen though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X