Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
ISIS was only able to appear because of Obama pulling troops too early from Iraq - just after "surge" worked there.
Pulling out too early? Or razing a functional country and executing it's leadership? Same question for Libya.
Don't get me wrong, I'll be very un-PC and make sweeping generalisations by calling these people ******* savages. But when a country is full of savages then that's all the more reason to not blow the cage doors of their hinges and let them run riot.
And maybe now the french in France, who aren't part of an insidious invasion attempt, will grow some balls and give up their self-destructive lefty nihilism.
Pulling out too early? Or razing a functional country and executing it's leadership? Same question for Libya.
Yes, US troops pulled too early. They should have stayed for 10 more years to ensure Iraq remains peaceful place that produces lots of oil for the good of the world and themselves - wealth to spread out and that would have helped deter ISIS types from appearing (plus drones that did a good job on Al Q).
Obama pulled the troops and gave opportunity for ISIS to form - 4 years ago when Assad used chemical attack which OBama said was red line he also hesitated and allowed Assad to stay - that also helped ISIS, essentially whole ISIS thing is result of Obama's mismanagement - just 7 hours ago he says this -
"President Barack Obama said that the U.S. strategy against ISIS has "contained them," but not yet succeeded in its effort to "decapitate" ISIS leadership"
The French security services are apparently not very good at what they are doing. The British ones are better.
Also, I would like to hear all those Snowden-apologists who insist that personal freedom is more important than personal security... what do they say now??
Yes, US troops pulled too early. They should have stayed for 10 more years to ensure Iraq remains peaceful place that produces lots of oil for the good of the world and themselves - wealth to spread out and that would have helped deter ISIS types from appearing (plus drones that did a good job on Al Q).
Obama pulled the troops and gave opportunity for ISIS to form - 4 years ago when Assad used chemical attack which OBama said was red line he also hesitated and allowed Assad to stay - that also helped ISIS, essentially whole ISIS thing is result of Obama's mismanagement - just 7 hours ago he says this -
"President Barack Obama said that the U.S. strategy against ISIS has "contained them," but not yet succeeded in its effort to "decapitate" ISIS leadership"
Yes they are so well contained that they can execute serious attack like the one took place in Paris tonight.
Funny how Obama and the US are always to blame no matter what they do. If he stays out of foreign countries than "he is a weak president and should do more abroad. He is allowing these horrible thing to happen". If he chooses to act, then - "The US should stay out of foreign countries, they have only themselves to blame if terror attacks happen."
It's undeniable now, that the world is a dangerous place. Permitting only dangerous men to arm themselves is as good as murder.
It's undeniable now. If you have more guns in circulation, you have more people killed by guns.
Or to put it in easy to understand terms - you'd trust a Frenchman with a gun?
Comment