AGW exists

[BrilloPad]

Judges plan to outlaw climate change 'denial’ - Telegraph

If you think AGW does not exist its the gas chambers for you. Or maybe they did not exist either?

[original PM]

I am glad some of my grandparents fought and died in a war whose main aim was to stop us being governed by a central European power who would tell us how to think.

I think we need to start really thinking about the phrase 'Lest we forget' it is not about remembering that people died - it is about remembering what they died for.

Luckily this is just scaremongering bulltulip

[pjclarke]

It's Christopher Booker. It's bollocks.

[DodgyAgent]

It's Christopher Booker. It's bollocks.

The good old Ad hominen" argument again. The thing is he is quoting facts Including senior judges and lawyers from across the world, the three-day conference on “Climate Change and the Law” was staged in London’s Supreme Court. It was funded, inter alia, by the Supreme Court itself, the UK government and the United

Which may be true or not. We will find out and no doubt in the interests of fairness if he is right he will be restored as a credible commentator on climate change

[unixman]

Calm down dears, it's just the Torygraph, with a "peak Torygraph" story. Wait 2 hours and you will hear no more about it.

All the papers do it.

[DodgyAgent]

Calm down dears, it's just the Torygraph, with a "peak Torygraph" story. Wait 2 hours and you will hear no more about it.

All the papers do it.

Which to be fair to our very own climate change Taliban enforcer is effectively what he said.

[pjclarke]

The good old Ad hominen" argument again. The thing is he is quoting facts Including senior judges and lawyers from across the world, the three-day conference on “Climate Change and the Law” was staged in London’s Supreme Court. It was funded, inter alia, by the Supreme Court itself, the UK government and the United

Which may be true or not. We will find out and no doubt in the interests of fairness if he is right he will be restored as a credible commentator on climate change

Unlikely, he wrote 'Judges plan to outlaw climate change denial' which is bollox.

He wrote 'A semi-secret, international conference of top judges proposed to make illegal any opinion that contradicted climate change' which is bollox

He wrote '“it could then be made illegal for any government, corporation (or presumably individual scientist) ever to question the agreed “science” again. '

Which is bollox. Really, the degree of paranoia on display here is astonishing. Here's a link to the actual event

King's College London - 'Adjudicating the Future' symposium puts focus on courts in climate response