Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
He wrote 'A semi-secret, international conference of top judges proposed to make illegal any opinion that contradicted climate change' which is bollox
He wrote '“it could then be made illegal for any government, corporation (or presumably individual scientist) ever to question the agreed “science” again. '
Which is bollox. Really, the degree of paranoia on display here is astonishing. Here's a link to the actual event
King's College London - 'Adjudicating the Future' symposium puts focus on courts in climate response
Leave a comment: