Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.
If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.
Foreign policy, simple enough for Bush to follow.
Iran is next.
Are you sure that Iran doesnt have nukes already ?
Russia claims they have at least 200 from Ukraine ...
Would be a good way of triggering the Rapture though if they have.
We didnt attack when they didnt have them...or did you miss that little part of history since the late 50's?
If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.
We didnt try to engineer a coup when they didnt have them which sorta makes a monkeys uncle out of your comment.
Foreign policy, simple enough for Bush to follow.
Iran is next.
Obviously not simple enough for you to follow though
Hey you werent that rampant lesbo tree huggin pinko commie homo at the "peace rally" here in London who was calling on the west to leave alone all those peace loving countries (like North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and co) were you?
Comment