Nukes...

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

MrsGoof replied

9 October 2006, 14:14
Originally posted by zeitghost

So the North Koreans have finally set one off...

Oh Dear(tm) or not?

their aim was terrible, they completly missed South Korea!
Leave a comment:
TheMonkey replied

9 October 2006, 14:04
Brilliant. My plan B of selling "premium grade" chicken wire to use as faraday cages against nuclear attack could actually work!

*Does the happy dance*
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

9 October 2006, 13:51
Damn, you showed me!

Regards

Mailman
Leave a comment:
MarillionFan replied

9 October 2006, 11:17
Hi Mailman

Re-arrange this well known saying 'Off Piss'.

hth
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

9 October 2006, 11:09
Originally posted by MarillionFan

Well hey have them so we won't attack.

We didnt attack when they didnt have them...or did you miss that little part of history since the late 50's?

If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.

We didnt try to engineer a coup when they didnt have them which sorta makes a monkeys uncle out of your comment.

Foreign policy, simple enough for Bush to follow.

Iran is next.

Obviously not simple enough for you to follow though

Hey you werent that rampant lesbo tree huggin pinko commie homo at the "peace rally" here in London who was calling on the west to leave alone all those peace loving countries (like North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and co) were you?

Mailman
Leave a comment:
deforce replied

9 October 2006, 10:42
"The latest report on Iran has it still falling short of having enough enriched uranium for a single nuclear bomb."

From here...
Leave a comment:
AlfredJPruffock replied

9 October 2006, 09:55
Originally posted by MarillionFan

Well hey have them so we won't attack.

If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.

Foreign policy, simple enough for Bush to follow.

Iran is next.

Are you sure that Iran doesnt have nukes already ?

Russia claims they have at least 200 from Ukraine ...

Would be a good way of triggering the Rapture though if they have.

Just kidding !
Leave a comment:
MarillionFan replied

9 October 2006, 09:19
Well hey have them so we won't attack.

If they didn't have them we would have engineered a coup and if we thought that they did have them but couldn't prove it we would have blasted them back to the stone age.

Foreign policy, simple enough for Bush to follow.

Iran is next.
Leave a comment:
zeitghost started a topic Nukes...

9 October 2006, 09:17
Nukes...

So the North Koreans have finally set one off...

Oh Dear(tm) or not?
Tags: None