Originally posted by Jog On
View Post
Terrorist state on the side of terrorists, no surprises here.
-
Two words - Russian veto.
Terrorist state on the side of terrorists, no surprises here. -
That was to remove Assad in the interest of US 'national security'. What about is it was to take out ISIS?Originally posted by AtW View Post
An alliance of Western leaders, Muslim nations and Vladimir Putin is the only way to defeat Isis - Comment - Voices - The Independent"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
What about Russian veto on international court for MH17 shot airliner?Originally posted by Jog On View Post
US national security is very nicely aligned with security of Western democratic states, who should have done a bit more to remove Assad long time ago - now they are taking on Syrian refugees among whom there will be scores of terrorists.Comment
-
1. DA was being sarcasticOriginally posted by LondonManc View PostAsk the Kurds, I'm sure they'd be delighted with Saddam still in charge.
2. It would be better for Iraq as a whole if Saddam were still around.
Sorry - but the country is barbaric. We should keep well clear.Comment
-
What veto on MH17? I believe (and please correct me if I'm wrong) Poroshenko is holding the veto on that one.Originally posted by AtW View Post
US national security serves US corporate interests and the $USD staying as the world reserve currency. Why are they so interested in Iraq/Syria/Iran? Why not spread some national security to North Korea and other regimes that need to be 'liberated'?"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon MuskComment
-
Ah sorry, I forgot that you only watch RT.comOriginally posted by Jog On View Post
MH17 crash: Russia vetoes UN resolution for international tribunal - BBC News
Or perhaps that link would be more trust-worthy for you -
Russia uses veto to block MH17 tribunal - Al Jazeera English
Ukraine and Poroshenko were FOR UN tribinal, the only country against was Russia, which given their veto meant that decision can't go ahead (for now). I guess they did not tell you that on RT.com?
North Korea got nukes and very prosperous (thanks to USA) South Korea next to it within range of 10k+ artillery units from NK- they will be dealt with last.Originally posted by Jog On View Post
btw I got no problems with USD staying the only reserve currency, which at the moment it isn't - EUR is the second reserve currency, which is nice.Last edited by AtW; 8 September 2015, 13:58.Comment
-
So that pretty much answers question on why international law does not do squat - Russia blocks it, China usually abstains.
Russia supported - Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad, Iran in general, Venezuela, Cuba - all utter scumbags who are best friends of Russian regimes for generations.
The sad part is that there are plenty of useful idiots (term used by Lenin) in the West who support USSR/Russia.Comment
-
DA is an agent. Don't over-estimate himOriginally posted by BrilloPad View Post
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Quite The self-loathing of the British Left is now a problem for us all – Telegraph BlogsOriginally posted by AtW View PostLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Didn't see them in Northern Ireland and according to the IRA, they were at war. I wonder why, US influence perhaps?Originally posted by Jog On View Post“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
Comment