• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Jeremy Corbyn

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Why replace one bad policy for one that is just slightly less bad? I agree that QE is a terrible policy. And for the sake of argument, lets say things like the police, law and order and some infrastructure need better funding. Why not instead focus on areas of the budget where there is waste and eliminate these to fund these improvements, rather than just conjuring money out of thin air?
    Last edited by Zero Liability; 23 August 2015, 19:42.

    Comment


      Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
      Why replace one bad policy for one that is just slightly less bad? I agree that QE is a terrible policy. And for the sake of argument, lets say things like the police, law and order and some infrastructure need better funding. Why not instead focus on areas of the budget where there is waste and eliminate these to fund these improvements, rather than just conjuring money out of thin air?
      Police, law, order - that's all current spending that should be financed from taxes.

      Big infrastructure spending should get big Govt support because private businesses require too high of a margin to justify long term investment - PPI tulip for example was insane policy, only good to hide effective borrowing of money from the Govt balance sheet.

      Comment


        That can still be funded through tax receipts; the rationale behind this money printing is that its consequences on the economy are less well understood than direct tax increases and it is easier to hide.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
          That can still be funded through tax receipts; the rationale behind this money printing is that its consequences on the economy are less well understood than direct tax increases and it is easier to hide.
          Money printing leads to inflation, drop in exchange rates - all good for the ekonomy since we all now know that it's the deflation that's the enemy!

          Comment


            Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
            That can still be funded through tax receipts; the rationale behind this money printing is that its consequences on the economy are less well understood than direct tax increases and it is easier to hide.

            It's inflation, obviously.
            hidden inflation
            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment


              Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
              It's inflation, obviously.
              hidden inflation
              A tax, by any other name...

              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              Money printing leads to inflation, drop in exchange rates - all good for the ekonomy since we all now know that it's the deflation that's the enemy!
              Deflation and contractors.

              Comment


                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                What is the ROI of QE so far??? It's negative because BoE was giving real money in exchange for some corporate BS bonds that would have never been sold on open market for the amount banks got. I'd rather have real working 21st century railways here passengers don't have to bend over and out of window to open the door.
                So you want to vote someone in so you don't have to lean out of the window to open a train door.

                A system that served us well for about 100 years.

                And therein lies the problem of why money is wasted.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by original PM View Post
                  So you want to vote someone in so you don't have to lean out of the window to open a train door.
                  Exactly right.

                  I'd also would like to vote for somebody who'd sort out the problem of queues to checkouts in Waitrose, but one can only hope for so much from Komrade Korbyn, let's not make his mission totally impossible, ok?

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by stek View Post
                    The Virgin Eastcoast train I took last week had doors like that.
                    They aren't slam door trains though.

                    The doors are locked while the train was in motion to prevent you falling outside on to the tracks.

                    The fact that you have to put your hand outside to open them when they are in the station doesn't make them dangerous.

                    Right up until the law had to be implemented in the UK I had to commute on slam door trains. If someone jumped of the train when it slowed down an alarm would go off. The guard would then have to run up and down the train to check no one had fallen on the tracks. The fact that the culprit had got of at a station the train wasn't scheduled to stop at made no difference.
                    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                      They aren't slam door trains though.

                      The doors are locked while the train was in motion to prevent you falling outside on to the tracks.

                      The fact that you have to put your hand outside to open them when they are in the station doesn't make them dangerous.

                      Right up until the law had to be implemented in the UK I had to commute on slam door trains. If someone jumped of the train when it slowed down an alarm would go off. The guard would then have to run up and down the train to check no one had fallen on the tracks. The fact that the culprit had got of at a station the train wasn't scheduled to stop at made no difference.
                      Ahh, don't think we had them in the North...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X