• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Wow never realised these times were so good!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I'm guessing ..

    1. There weren't so many people about, especially in the years soon after WW1 and WW2

    2. Mortgages were tougher to obtain, for anyone but self-evidently regular savers over several years, with good prospects, and many didn't have the means or the self-discipline to save like that.

    2. Massive housebuilding projects after the WWs meant there wasn't such a shortage, and many people preferred newer smaller houses as the older ones, with Victorian wiring and leaky windows etc, tended to be money pits

    3. Incredible as it sounds to us today, until about the '60s big houses and/or houses with large gardens and even oodles of acres of land were generally seen as a burden
    New houses were usually pretty decent. I know there was some non standard construction and asbestos, but still reasonable plots, in reasonable locations, for reasonable money.

    Today a new build is built on the edge of town, no conveniences, made out of paper, with 'hear your mrs take a tulip thin walls', and on top of one another, f all garden, f all space to park a car, and lots of speed bumps, and totally overlooked.

    http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-...-52879190.html
    http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by WTFH View Post
      Because we consider many things "essential" now which were previously luxuries.


      Taking kids away at half term/Easter & summer for foreign holidays? 30 years ago it was rare, now it's almost compulsory
      Multi-car households? Rare 50 years ago, maybe some households would have 2 cars, but there weren't households where everyone over 17 had a car.
      Mobile phone/broadband/subscription TV
      Then there's the tablets, computers, gadgets, and we tend to replace rather than repair.
      Consumerism is just that - consuming things.
      ...but if we don't have the latest and greatest, then we can't boast about it on Facebook and our lives are over.
      Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
      But everything you list has gone down in price.

      So, 4 holidays now cost less than 1 holiday 30 years ago? I don't think so. I remember Freddie Laker - the Stelios of his day, and you didn't pay extra for food, bags etc.
      In the 1960s how much did a mobile phone cost? Or a broadband connection? Or Sky? They certainly haven't come down in price from 40+ years ago.


      So, possibly the cost of buying a car has gone down, but fuel for the car has gone way up, as has insurance. In 1971 a gallon of petrol was 34.25p, that's 7.54p per litre.
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        So, 4 holidays now cost less than 1 holiday 30 years ago? I don't think so. I remember Freddie Laker - the Stelios of his day, and you didn't pay extra for food, bags etc.
        In the 1960s how much did a mobile phone cost? Or a broadband connection? Or Sky? They certainly haven't come down in price from 40+ years ago.


        So, possibly the cost of buying a car has gone down, but fuel for the car has gone way up, as has insurance. In 1971 a gallon of petrol was 34.25p, that's 7.54p per litre.
        It makes no sense to me. The whole country is so fvcked up.
        http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
          It makes no sense to me. The whole country is so fvcked up.
          Let me google that for you

          Comment


            #15
            Massively increasing welfare spend, i.e. the social protection section of the budget. It makes up over half of the c.£250bn central government spend. State pension accounts for around £75bn of that, with housing benefit and disability living allowance the silver and bronze awards at around 17 and 13 billion pounds respectively. A total of over £40billion is paid to low income families in some shape or form.
            The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

            Comment


              #16
              So the answer for the government is to copy China scrap all the green laws and allow as many polluting factories as possible, then ever increasing people will die younger than expected saving a fortune in state pensions

              Of course that mean leaving the EU first which will never be allowed
              Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

              No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                I'd love to - but the boomers are everywhere...

                http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
                  DP, unfortunately the population projection shown by 'Market Oracle', and even their latest 2015 one, still calculates it's trendline from 2010...for eh, reasons unknown.

                  Using the latest data I'd suggest it would probably look a little more like this:

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Wow never realised these times were so good!





                    I agree population increases is pushing on demand. But so are Chinese investors buying in London (and letting the property sit empty).

                    No to BTL.

                    No to foreign investors.

                    Yes to more taxes on wealthy boomers.
                    Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 18 August 2015, 20:11.
                    http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by zeitghost
                      Ah.

                      I understand.

                      According to the Mauve Ape it's all down to the evil boomers.
                      He obviously read it on @rsebook or twatter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X