Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Why we MUST ditch our lazy attitude to finding work through agents and agencies
So how much would this affect me... ?
Most of my gigs are in London and I pay £96 pw on a rail card which I clame back in full through my company on my monthly expencies.
So if this comes in thats £384 pm I can't clame back, but surely my dividends would increace?
So how much would this affect me... ?
Most of my gigs are in London and I pay £96 pw on a rail card which I clame back in full through my company on my monthly expencies.
So if this comes in thats £384 pm I can't clame back, but surely my dividends would increace?
So how much would this affect me... ?
Most of my gigs are in London and I pay £96 pw on a rail card which I clame back in full through my company on my monthly expencies.
So if this comes in thats £384 pm I can't clame back, but surely my dividends would increace?
There will be no net dividend from next financial year, as the 10% credit is being abolished so it should be up to the gross amount when the dividend tax is introduced.
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrellaView Post
HMRC's beef is that more people than HMG intended are getting tax relief on T&S expenses. We can assume that this is due to the fact that vast numbers of low paid workers have been forced to work through brollies or PSC's so that companies can avoid employment costs. If that's the case then why not implement something along the lines that Eek's suggested but rule that workers under a certain income threshold cannot be engaged through an intermediary - that would move them all back into permanent employment or FTC's (banning of zero hours contracts would prevent exploitation) and lots of HMRC's problems would be solved. By constantly aligning tax legislation to employment law they have to use a sledge hammer to crack a nut most of the time - if they stick with numbers all our lives will be a lot easier
New lie forced employment costs on almost every employer and Agency. Large companies realised they could force people to pay to work by making them incorporate and work self employed.
Instead of finding new ways to tax people they should look for ways to stop employers screwing the vulnerable. With the exception of a few posters on here I wouldn't count us as 'vulnerable'.
As for IR35 I'm all for an employees & 80/20 rule to start selection then follow with some concrete tests e.g. significant expenses,premises, staff , advertising, creation of product, liabilities etc.
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
There will be no net dividend from next financial year, as the 10% credit is being abolished so it should be up to the gross amount when the dividend tax is introduced.
With crayons, and Alphabites please explain what you just said.
Comment