One reason to vote Corbyn

[unixman]

Iraq war was lunacy...

With the benefit of hindsight , the Iraq invasion might have been a mistake. You might balance the horrors of ISIS against the horrors of Saddam and find (for all I know), that Saddam killed far more and that it was right to remove him. On the other hand, it might be that the consequences of the war are indeed worse than Saddam, and the invasion was therefore a deadly mistake. If Saddam had been left to brew, how would things look now.

I find it hard to decide. The Chilcot report might help if it hasn't already been buried on Pluto. I do get a bit annoyed at the media (who supported the Iraq invasion), Parliament (who supported the invasion), individual MPs (who supported the invasion), British public (who, overall, supported the invasion), celebrities on Question Time (who supported the invasion), Guardianistas (who supported the invasion), suddenly realizing that they don't like the unforeseen consequences of a war (which they wanted) 15 years later, and trying to distance themselves from it by blaming Blair.

[DodgyAgent]

With the benefit of hindsight , the Iraq invasion might have been a mistake. You might balance the horrors of ISIS against the horrors of Saddam and find (for all I know), that Saddam killed far more and that it was right to remove him. On the other hand, it might be that the consequences of the war are indeed worse than Saddam, and the invasion was therefore a deadly mistake. If Saddam had been left to brew, how would things look now.

I find it hard to decide. The Chilcot report might help if it hasn't already been buried on Pluto. I do get a bit annoyed at the media (who supported the Iraq invasion), Parliament (who supported the invasion), individual MPs (who supported the invasion), British public (who, overall, supported the invasion), celebrities on Question Time (who supported the invasion), Guardianistas (who supported the invasion), suddenly realizing that they don't like the unforeseen consequences of a war (which they wanted) 15 years later, and trying to distance themselves from it by blaming Blair.

Well said

[BrilloPad]

Would it be good for Britain?

Would it be bad for Britain?

You know what Corbyn does not care it is about him getting his name in lights..

look look look me me me

and that for me is one of the many reason tw@s like this should get nowehere near public office

the UK does not exist to give him something to do - make things better or fook off

Almost every politician cares more about themselves than the country.

[DodgyAgent]

Almost every politician cares more about themselves than the country.

Maggie cared about the country more than herself

[original PM]

Maggie cared about the country more than herself

Indeed - one of the reason some small minority groups hate her - she put the good of the many over the good of the few.

[MicrosoftBob]

With the benefit of hindsight , the Iraq invasion might have been a mistake. You might balance the horrors of ISIS against the horrors of Saddam and find (for all I know), that Saddam killed far more and that it was right to remove him. On the other hand, it might be that the consequences of the war are indeed worse than Saddam, and the invasion was therefore a deadly mistake. If Saddam had been left to brew, how would things look now.

I find it hard to decide. The Chilcot report might help if it hasn't already been buried on Pluto. I do get a bit annoyed at the media (who supported the Iraq invasion), Parliament (who supported the invasion), individual MPs (who supported the invasion), British public (who, overall, supported the invasion), celebrities on Question Time (who supported the invasion), Guardianistas (who supported the invasion), suddenly realizing that they don't like the unforeseen consequences of a war (which they wanted) 15 years later, and trying to distance themselves from it by blaming Blair.

All correct, but Blair dug himself a hole by lying to parliament and using an American students thesis and presenting it as evidence as the justification for war, and thus parliament approved a war based on a lie

He handed justification for those who want to discredit him

[unixman]

All correct, but Blair dug himself a hole by lying to parliament and using an American students thesis and presenting it as evidence as the justification for war, and thus parliament approved a war based on a lie

Perhaps he did. Chilcot will supposedly tell us, if it is published before the next ice age. Certainly Blair seemed to be in love with George W Bush. All British Prime Ministers appear to become star-struck with whatever American president is sitting at the time. Sometimes it works well, as with with Thatcher/Reagan. But with Blair/Bush, maybe better if they had never met.

[AtW]

And why he won't get the leadership: Tony Blair could face trial over 'illegal' Iraq war, says Jeremy Corbyn | UK news | The Guardian

Fast public trial, followed by even faster execution.

Korbyn

[DimPrawn]

Fast public trial, followed by even faster execution.

Korbyn

Firing squad, hanging or electric chair?

Something I will enjoy thinking about....

[AtW]

Firing squad, hanging or electric chair?

Something I will enjoy thinking about....

Put it out as referendum?

It's democracy after all.

Combine it with EU vote and record turnout will be guaranteed.