• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Is this the end of National Insurance?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by ASB View Post
    It shows all sorts of other deductions too. And doesn't generally show Ers NI as a deduction.

    It aint rocket science to work it of course.

    Personally I think there should be a box along the lines of "Paid to HMRC" being Ee NI + Er NI + Income Tax + Class 1A NI on things like cars and medical.

    Except that is a scary large number compared to a decent gross salary.
    I've been surprised, almost shocked at how few permies even know of the existence of Employers NI, let alone what rate it's charged at or what it's charged on. As a stealth tax it's stupendously effective as people have no concept that it's something that they pay rather than something their "boss" pays so when it's mentioned in the press it's ignored.

    I can see the appeal of binning NI, but will they really do away with something they can change and claim "no increase to Income Tax"? It feels unlikely, plus there's going to be a hefty admin and IT cost to implementing the change, I'm sure they will sell that as a cost saving measure though.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      It does effectively. The cost vs. benefit decision your employer makes on whether to give you a job has to include Employer's NI, so potentially we could all be paid more if it wasn't for Employer's NI.
      My point was, you don't see it as a deduction from what your salary is Vs what you take home. There are all kinds of costs to an employee and Employers' NI is just one of them. In the greater scheme of things of course you're right, but from the mindset of a permie, who doesn't care about what they cost their employer, I disagree

      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      Corporation Tax is a silly tax. They should get rid of it and just tax dividends as normal shareholders' income (though you'd have to do something different for overseas shareholders I guess). This would have the advantage of encouraging businesses to build up funds ensuring better stability; investing more, and best of all would put half of the accountancy profession out of work. Win win, unless you're an accountant.
      One advantage of CT (maybe) is that it benefits companies who distribute more profit to employees i.e. pay great salaries. Or is that a dumb argument?
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Halo Jones View Post
        If they get rid of NI then it’s easier to make the NHS “pay per use” as the logic of I pay insurance for that is no longer valid.

        Or am I being paranoid?
        That would be really stupid.

        Much better (for them) to continue to collect NI and make NHS pay per use.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          Your dividend voucher shows a big number at the top
          FTFY

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Employer's NI isn't relevant - it doesn't come out of the salary you receive.
            You are, Sir, a true

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              You are, Sir, a true
              From the point of view of an employee, I am right. A typical employee has absolutely zero idea how much NI their employer has to pay, they only care about their salary and how much of it they get to keep.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #37
                I'm hugely in favour of the income tax/NI merge which was actually promised in 2010. NI is so complex that most people don't know how much they pay, in what class, or why. Governments have used NI as an entire stealth ecosystem to bury taxes in. And of course NI is the natural enemy of the contractor, who must pay 2 sets of it (umbrella) or none (Ltd/dividends).

                Throw out this rats nest and replace it with a nice tidy cupboard. And the same goes for the rest of the labyrinthine tax laws that give huge avoidance to the big boys, while fining the little people £100 if they so much as send a form in late.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by unixman View Post
                  I'm hugely in favour of the income tax/NI merge which was actually promised in 2010. NI is so complex that most people don't know how much they pay, in what class, or why. Governments have used NI as an entire stealth ecosystem to bury taxes in. And of course NI is the natural enemy of the contractor, who must pay 2 sets of it (umbrella) or none (Ltd/dividends).

                  Throw out this rats nest and replace it with a nice tidy cupboard. And the same goes for the rest of the labyrinthine tax laws that give huge avoidance to the big boys, while fining the little people £100 if they so much as send a form in late.
                  There is a whole industry around our complex tax laws.

                  If they were simplified like in a lots of countries over half the industry would have to find new jobs....
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                    From the point of view of an employee, I am right. A typical employee has absolutely zero idea how much NI their employer has to pay, they only care about their salary and how much of it they get to keep.
                    You are correct from a point of view of a cretin who does not see the big picture and does not want to see it.

                    I hereby declare you the official CUK Cretin of the Year 2015.

                    Well done!

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      You are correct from a point of view of a cretin who does not see the big picture and does not want to see it.
                      Like I said, employees.

                      When you were an employee, did you know/care about your employer's tax situation? Just because you now hire 2 employees at £17k a year, doesn't mean everyone else worries about your NI payments.
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X