Originally posted by WordIsBond
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Official Summer 2015 Budget Thread
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Or Co. Sec. If your spouse is a shareholder then she probably ought to be one of those two things anyway. -
No it isn't. You still have to show that the salary paid is an accurate reflection of the value of the work done.Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostIf you make the spouse a director, it is easier to justify a higher salary.
Just being a director does not automatically infer some sort of value associated with the title."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
It would be (certainly after they adjust dividend rates in the future upwards) more or less the same as Income Tax + NICs (employee and employer). That's their objective and since they could not put NICs onto dividends they just nuked totally sensible tax credit which surely was less than actual amount of corp tax paid.Originally posted by tractor View PostAs with IR35, the devil will be in the detail.
Expect the worst, then you won't be disappointed.
Comment
-
...
Exactly but once you understand the principle, it becomes easier to apply it across the two bands.Originally posted by Platypus View PostThanks, but I think this is what I was referring to:Comment
-
That's a matter of opinion. Some would argue that the legal responsibilities involved with being a director carry some value worth remunerating.Originally posted by DaveB View PostJust being a director does not automatically infer some sort of value associated with the title.Comment
-
No, there is no connection between being a shareholder in a company and holding a position with that company. The two are completely seperate.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostOr Co. Sec. If your spouse is a shareholder then she probably ought to be one of those two things anyway."Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
-
I notice as a minor curiosity that the chancellor quoted 2 people in his support in his speech: Ed Balls and Alastair Darling.Comment
-
Day rates only need to rise if every contractor claims large T&S - not all do.Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostIt would be nuts for it to affect ltds. Arguably even many brolly contractors.
Day rates would have to shoot up overnight, or the workforce will collapse as so many people travel so far to work on contracts.
This just means those with low/zero T&S will now have a competitive advantage and will clean up all the available contracts.Comment
-
StatementOriginally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostAlso things to think about how it affects those who have a spouse/partner/whoever as a company shareholder. Will the £5k dividend allowance apply irrespective of you other income? If your only income is dividend income, will you still get taxed at 7.5% on dividends between £5-10k even if within the personal allowance threshold, or can you actually earn £15k (personal allowance + dividend allowance) before paying any tax?
Top of page 45, 1.187:
So it appears it comes on top of the personal allowance, and a spouse with no salary or other income is likely to be able to receive £16K of dividends before the tax kicks in.Combined with the increases the government has made to the personal allowance and the introduction of the Personal Savings Allowance, from April 2016 individuals will be able to receive up to £17,000 of income per annum tax free....
That's not ironclad, but that's the way it seems to read.
Agreed. You can have her sign any cheques, send invoices, sign the corporate return, etc.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostOr Co. Sec. If your spouse is a shareholder then she probably ought to be one of those two things anyway.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment