• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

When you have a minute...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority That one is quite interesting too.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
      So almost like a salary sacrifice arrangement really
      Pretty much, MPs are underpaid for what they do but no one had the guts to argue to keep their wages in line with inflation

      Instead fiddling expenses was seen as a perk that all the major parties tolerated to make up for it
      Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

      No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
        Pretty much, MPs are underpaid for what they do but no one had the guts to argue to keep their wages in line with inflation

        Instead fiddling expenses was seen as a perk that all the major parties tolerated to make up for it
        Being "underpaid" considering the house gets to set its own wage levels is fairly absurd. Unless you regard their pay as appropriate in the context of serving their constituencies. More than a few members barely set foot in Westminster between the opening and closing ceremonies.

        Fiddling the expenses system which, compared to what the rest of us is allowable, is still generous to say the least wasn't a suitable or sensible answer.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
          Being "underpaid" considering the house gets to set its own wage levels is fairly absurd.
          Are you sure about that?
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #45
            <bump> We will be submitting anonymised responses from contractors from all different sectors to HMRC's planned changes to the T&S rules - I'd really appreciate if you guys could take a couple of minutes our of your busy days to add the benefit of your wisdom Budget 2015 : AUCAE launch survey urging contractors to have their voice heard. - All Umbrella Companies Are Equal

            Thanks
            Connect with me on LinkedIn

            Follow us on Twitter.

            ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

            Comment


              #46
              Great response to survey so far...

              Just thought it was worth a quick update to say thanks to those of you who have had your say on the T&S changes dues, we have had a great response to the survey so far with some interesting feedback from both Ltd Co contractors and umbrella contractors. If anyone fancies having their say then please fill in the survey. All responses will be anonymised before submitting

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                In fairness it has been sucessive governments that politicised expenses, as pay rises were seen as bad publicity they kept them lower than they wanted and encouraged MPs to claim as much as possible

                Then of course in an internet age, journalists start investigating individual MPs expenses and this whole circus kicked off

                Looking at what they do, they should be able to claim home to work travel, they have a job outside any normal remit

                The problem is expenses have been used as an alternative for pay rises, rather than their right to claim expenses
                One prime minister in particular. To avoid stupid aguments, I won't name her.

                Comment

                Working...
                X