Originally posted by pjclarke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Green leader Bennett sorry for 'excruciating' interview
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.” -
Originally posted by pjclarke View PostApologies for the erroneous singular, however the Argentinian claim to sovereignty over the islands dates from 1833, is supported by most Latin American countries and China, and was the subject of a UN resolution as recently as 1988, and is written into the Argentinian constitution as ' a permanent and unwavering goal of the Argentine people'.
An accusation often levelled at The Left and the Greens has been one of naivity, that its fine to have principles, but they are often trumped by real-world economic realities and pragmatism.
The principle here is that the Islanders' right to self-determination, which is fine, part of International Law and which I in general support, however the cost of defending that 'right' in the face of aggression was nearly 1,000 lives (including three islanders killed by friendly fire) and about £1,000 for every household in this country (or over £1 million per Islander). An expensive principle.
A peaceful and negotiated handover, over time, with transition and relocation arrangements, and with the Islanders offered substantial compensation, it seems to me would have been a far more 'pragmatic' and less bloody solution. But it didn't, and won't happen - because of 'principle'.
You are aware that the USA could rightly claim the Falklands as well?
Just because you can claim sovereignty to a piece of land and put it in your written constitution doesn't mean you have the right to it especially if people live on it and have done so for generations. (Falkland islanders are a bit inbred.)
Also if you read my initial post I pointed out if the Argentinians hadn't been stupid and invaded they would probably have ruled them by now.
Not everything is about money. You sound like one of the accountants people complain about who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. International diplomacy and the people's rights such as the right to self determination are worth more than money."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Sorry, who is the unlubricated dildo(s) who is \ are linking a car crash interview with a rather tenuous claim by Argentina over the Falklands?I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
Had the Falkland Islanders been a bunch of Lentil eating banner waving lesbians "at one" with the planet you can bet any amount of money that the attitude of the left would have been quite different.
People on both sides of the political spectrum are often against wars as they are against people being used as pawns of political leaders especially if there is very little to be gained e.g. Iraq war."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostSorry, who is the unlubricated dildo(s) who is \ are linking a car crash interview with a rather tenuous claim by Argentina over the Falklands?"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThreads evolve.I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYou are aware that the USA could rightly claim the Falklands as well?Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostSince I worked with a former ex-military guy who fought in the Falklands and was definitely left wing, I don't understand why you think the "left" thinks this.
People on both sides of the political spectrum are often against wars as they are against people being used as pawns of political leaders especially if there is very little to be gained e.g. Iraq war.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostSpain could rightly claim Argentina as wellLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostYou are aware that the USA could rightly claim the Falklands as well?
Just because you can claim sovereignty to a piece of land and put it in your written constitution doesn't mean you have the right to it especially if people live on it and have done so for generations. (Falkland islanders are a bit inbred.)
Also if you read my initial post I pointed out if the Argentinians hadn't been stupid and invaded they would probably have ruled them by now.
Not everything is about money. You sound like one of the accountants people complain about who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. International diplomacy and the people's rights such as the right to self determination are worth more than money.
And, as I said, I support self-determination, my admittedly flippant response was to point out the disproprtionate cost of defending that principle in this case (getting a Vulcan to bomb Port Stanley airport took multiple re-fuellings from multiple tanker aircraft, the raid did little damage). Untangling the historical claims to the islands is beyond my pay grade, however it is the case that they were settled by the French and the Spanish before us, and the British settlers abandoned the islands in the mid 18th Century. The Argentine aggression was illegal, immoral and self-defeating, but I find it absurd that a pragmatic and peaceful solution to the dispute remains elusive and we continue to be responsible for the defence of a tiny territory a third of the way around the globe.My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment