There was a lot of discussion in the press about why the ethnic origin of those criminals is relevant and should be mentioned. It's not that everyone from one of the two villages these people's ancestors came from will be misogynists and abusers, but that it was a gang operating entirely within one British sub-culture.
Sometimes, ethnic origin is relevant. Sometimes it isn't. In the Rotherham case it was. The children were raped and assaulted and the police and council did nothing precisely because they were entirely within that culture.
Andrew Norfolk, who broke the story considered that the ethnicity was crucial to the story and the investigation, even though, as he points out: "...the vast majority of convicted child-sex offenders in this country — take your pick from crimes against boys, or pre-pubescent children, or institutional or online crimes — are white British men, usually acting alone. "
Sometimes, ethnic origin is relevant. Sometimes it isn't. In the Rotherham case it was. The children were raped and assaulted and the police and council did nothing precisely because they were entirely within that culture.
Andrew Norfolk, who broke the story considered that the ethnicity was crucial to the story and the investigation, even though, as he points out: "...the vast majority of convicted child-sex offenders in this country — take your pick from crimes against boys, or pre-pubescent children, or institutional or online crimes — are white British men, usually acting alone. "
Comment