Page 3 RIP !

[Pondlife]

She doesn't count, she's a lesbian.

I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.

Anyone?

[vetran]

Like this?



Edit: There's something slightly disturbing about that picture.

disgusting you are just objectifying him, who is going to take him seriously?

Anyway its no good you missed 'News in Briefs' it should say

'David thinks that the Queen's Corgi's should stop lazing around and get a real job! like that nice Mr Cameron says all scroungers should.'

[VectraMan]

I think men in the UK have moved on from looking at women in this way. The feminazis have a point.

I've always thought it was just weird. I'm not claiming I haven't once or twice given into temptation and looked at pictures of naked laydeez, but there's a time and a place and it probably isn't when you read the newspaper. Imagine how many men over the decades have been ogling naked norks whilst having breakfast with their kids. It's just ... wrong. And I don't mean morally; I mean wrong in a weird, sick, twisted, deeply unpleasant way.

I heard on the telly news this morning this was a partial victory - which made me wonder if they were only going to show one nipple from now on, but means Page 3 will continue but be nipple free. I'm not sure how much better that really is.

[FatLazyContractor]

This:

[Jubber]

Has it ever been a newspaper?

More of a comic (haven't looked at it for decades so not sure what it is actually like now) when I used to 'read' it. Surely no one takes it seriously, not sure the people who create it do - do they? I always got the impression that the journos who created the stories were quite intelligent, writing in a moronic style.

I'd put it in the same category as Viz of Nuts or something similar. (unless it has changed considerably of course)

[darmstadt]

For those missing page 3, here's a pair of tits:

[mudskipper]

Mr ms buys it sometimes. Apparently he likes the sport section.

[MarillionFan]

For those missing page 3, here's a pair of tits:

I was going to go a bit more below the skirt and put up a picture of Ed Balls and Milliband, but don't want to get banned.

[FatLazyContractor]

Mr ms buys it sometimes. Apparently he likes the sport section.

Does he buy the Weekend edition? Or is it just a random weekday?

The "content" varies, you know!

[ZARDOZ]

I've always thought it was just weird. I'm not claiming I haven't once or twice given into temptation and looked at pictures of naked laydeez, but there's a time and a place and it probably isn't when you read the newspaper. Imagine how many men over the decades have been ogling naked norks whilst having breakfast with their kids. It's just ... wrong. And I don't mean morally; I mean wrong in a weird, sick, twisted, deeply unpleasant way.

I heard on the telly news this morning this was a partial victory - which made me wonder if they were only going to show one nipple from now on, but means Page 3 will continue but be nipple free. I'm not sure how much better that really is.

What is slightly uncomfortable is when you see an old man reading it, and some old people do seem to like The Sun. It just looks pervy, which kind of makes you wonder what is the point of it. Perhaps it made sense in a time long passed. On the other hand taking it up market just makes it more difficult to identify the morons.