Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Palace steps up Andrew denials
Collapse
X
-
Could have been KGB you know, the Prince should be more careful and, given his age, he should not expect young girls kissing or bedding him at the party for any reason other than to set him up. -
The royals build up a great empire and can only be faulted for using wrong strategy with the American colonies. The "elected leaders" pissed away the empire.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostBleedin' eck aTW! With the possible exception of Elizabeth 1 and Charles 2, when did any royalty ever do that? Any sensible laws we have, have mostly come from elected leaders. Got any examples?
Comment
-
I really think your knowledge of British history is a bit faulty AtW, the real power of the royals ended a long while before that.The royals build up a great empire and can only be faulted for using wrong strategy with the American colonies.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
So you credit great elected Leaders like Bliar?Originally posted by xoggoth View PostI really think your knowledge of British history is a bit faulty AtW, the real power of the royals ended a long while before that.Comment
-
Indeed. The only shaggable prince is Harry, although he's a bit too young for me. I guess he takes after his fatherOriginally posted by AtW View PostCould have been KGB you know, the Prince should be more careful and, given his age, he should not expect young girls kissing or bedding him at the party for any reason other than to set him up.
Comment
-
What the???? So the fact that Bliar was a total dickhead means Queen Elizabeth was actually in charge??So you credit great elected Leaders like Bliar?
While monarchy has not been without influence, Parliament has been responsible for all laws in the UK since late 17th century.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
You'd say no?Originally posted by mudskipper View PostIndeed. The only shaggable prince is Harry, although he's a bit too young for me. I guess he takes after his father
Comment
-
Responsible, yes for sure, why would monarchy want to be held responsible for all that tulip?Originally posted by xoggoth View PostWhile monarchy has not been without influence, Parliament has been responsible for all laws in the UK since late 17th century.
Comment
-
-
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment