Should we allow aircraft to just dump fuel? Sounds fuel polluting. And quite expensive - their profits are too high.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
More pollution and global warming
Collapse
X
-
-
They take on more fuel than needed so that they can get a free set of glass tumblersOriginally posted by BrilloPad View PostShould we allow aircraft to just dump fuel? Sounds fuel polluting. And quite expensive - their profits are too high."A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell -
Would you prefer them to attempt a crash landing with a full tank of fuel?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostShould we allow aircraft to just dump fuel? Sounds fuel polluting. And quite expensive - their profits are too high.
This is one of the reasons they dump fuel.Comment
-
I remember collecting medals from the 1970 world cup squad from Esso.Originally posted by Paddy View PostThey take on more fuel than needed so that they can get a free set of glass tumblersComment
-
Takeoff weight is higher than the maximum landing weightOriginally posted by BrilloPad View PostShould we allow aircraft to just dump fuel? Sounds fuel polluting. And quite expensive - their profits are too high.
(Also, the lighter the aircraft is the slower it can fly/land - a nice bonus if you're missing some wheels)Comment
-
-
Possibly have detachable fuel tanks that could be ejected out in case of an emergencyOriginally posted by Brussels Slumdog View PostWould you prefer them to attempt a crash landing with a full tank of fuel?
This is one of the reasons they dump fuel.
Comment
-
So lower their fuel efficiency and load carrying ability by adding the weight of a pointlessly engineered solution to a problem that doesn't exist. They can simply burn off excess fuel by circling or dump it in an emergency.Originally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostPossibly have detachable fuel tanks that could be ejected out in case of an emergency
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52
- The beginning of the end for Boox ‘MSC’ contractors has begun. Check back in 2031 Jun 24 06:25

Comment