Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
FLCs - LFIG Proposal
Collapse
X
-
+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Yes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...Comment
-
It's inevitable that scenario would play out, there's no debate that the Agencies would take the path of least resistance which is to ignore contractors who won't use the FLC approach.Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
Optional or not is utterly irrelevant the Agencies ignore their toothless regulation bodies.Comment
-
Nope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Make them work via an FLC thoughOriginally posted by eek View PostNope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Today 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Yesterday 07:45
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Jul 13 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38


Comment