Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
FLCs - LFIG Proposal
Collapse
X
-
+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Yes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...Comment
-
It's inevitable that scenario would play out, there's no debate that the Agencies would take the path of least resistance which is to ignore contractors who won't use the FLC approach.Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
Optional or not is utterly irrelevant the Agencies ignore their toothless regulation bodies.Comment
-
Nope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Make them work via an FLC thoughOriginally posted by eek View PostNope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? Today 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? Yesterday 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42
- Getting a mortgage when you're a contractor. The system wasn't built for you. Is that finally changing? May 22 06:11
- How deepfake AI contractors threaten umbrella company supply chains under JSL May 20 06:31
- Mileage rates review: Will the first AMAP rethink in 15 years benefit contractors? May 19 05:57
- What is a Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE), and are FDE jobs for IT contractors ripe? May 18 04:43
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25


Comment