Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
FLCs - LFIG Proposal
Collapse
X
-
+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...merely at clientco for the entertainment -
Yes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...Comment
-
It's inevitable that scenario would play out, there's no debate that the Agencies would take the path of least resistance which is to ignore contractors who won't use the FLC approach.Originally posted by eek View Post+1 opting out and opting in is supposedly optional but many agencies won't deal with people who want to opt in. If payments to an FLC are excluded from HMRC's agency requirements I can imagine most agencies will say use an FLC or forget about that contract...
Optional or not is utterly irrelevant the Agencies ignore their toothless regulation bodies.Comment
-
Nope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYes - there's a difference between it being optional in legislation (which it will be) and optional in practice (which it won't be)
It's perfectly simple - you keep a Ltd for the one place that accepts them, and an FLC for everything else...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Make them work via an FLC thoughOriginally posted by eek View PostNope I move up the food chain replace agents with salesmen and bring contractors in to pick up the stuff I can't offshore.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Comment