- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
OK a challenge for the congregation
Collapse
X
-
-
What about something like this that combines the sink and toilet but without the emptying out faff as mentioned above

Cooke & Lewis Duetto Close-Coupled Soft Close Standard Seat Toilet & Basin Pack | Departments | DIY at B&QComment
-
-
Or just open the window.Originally posted by Paddy View PostInside toilets are unhealthy. Have a privy at the bottom of the garden.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
probably will do but sometimes the guys on here say oh yes we had a similar problem and we did X which is completely out of the box.Originally posted by Churchill View PostHire an architect.
its a compliment on the diversity of expertise available on here and there predominantly positive and go getting culture.
We have already had a toilet & sink combined which I hadn't realised was commercially available.Comment
-
Building regulations cover ventilation and its likely we will have an extractor fanOriginally posted by d000hg View PostOr just open the window.Comment
-
That could be painful.Originally posted by vetran View PostBuilding regulations cover ventilation and its likely we will have an extractor fanOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
In my humble opinion no en-suite is far, far better than a rubbish/ cramped one.
Unless the main bathroom is on another floor, then an en-suite is a luxury. An en-suite that no-one over 5' 8" can use comfortably is NOT a luxury.
Spend the money on pimping up the main bathroom instead.Comment
-
So your clothes are locked in with you when you're showering/dumping? That displeases me somehow.
I saw an en suite just as you describe (minus wardrobe) on a Beanie programme and I thought it looked ace.Comment
-
We have 3 daughters, the main bathroom means crossing the landing and the temporary bedroom will become a guest bedroom when we extend.Originally posted by JRCT View PostIn my humble opinion no en-suite is far, far better than a rubbish/ cramped one.
Unless the main bathroom is on another floor, then an en-suite is a luxury. An en-suite that no-one over 5' 8" can use comfortably is NOT a luxury.
Spend the money on pimping up the main bathroom instead.
But take your point, we need to make it comfortable otherwise it will just annoy.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment