Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Yes we do. We don't have the vast tracts of empty space but we certainly have some good countryside where there is lots of wind and no people.
People aren't, and shouldn't be, the only consideration when it comes to wind turbines.
Unfortunately, most sites that are identified as good for wind farms are also important sites for birds and other wildlife.
For example, Barvis Moor in the Outer Hebrides had an application for c140 turbines, which would have been the largest on-shore farm in the UK. This was turned down, mainly due to the ecological importance of the peat moor and how reliant ground nesting birds are on the moor. Also, 20% of the UKs eagles are resident in the Hebrides. They are regularly killed by turbines on other sites around the world. Not very eco-friendly.
OK, then the wildlife can have acid rain instead. Which is more damaging, a few birds getting minced or the whole ecology changing because none of the indigenous plants can survive any more?
OK, then the wildlife can have acid rain instead. Which is more damaging, a few birds getting minced or the whole ecology changing because none of the indigenous plants can survive any more?
If it was 'a few' then you might have an arguement. But it's not. That IS the point.
Comment