• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Maths query

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    As NF points out

    Therefore .9 recurring is 3 thirds. Which IS exactly equal to 1.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      Where's sasguru when we need him?
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
        Where's sasguru when we need him?
        It's never come up.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Code:
          double d = 0.99999999999999999;
          
          if( d == 1.0 )
          {
          	std::cout << "Yes";
          }
          else
          {
                  std::cout << "No";
          }
          It says Yes. One less 9 and it says No.
          Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Therefore .9 recurring is 3 thirds. Which IS exactly equal to 1.
            That's conjecture. Develop a theory and prove it.

            There's no evidence that .999 to infinity will equal 1.

            Honestly Euclid would be turning in his grave. 2000 years later and humans still cannot grasp infinity.

            Understand his thought experiment on infinite primes and you'll understand why .999 recurring will always be that.

            Euclid's Proof of the Infinitude of Primes
            Last edited by scooterscot; 3 October 2014, 08:52.
            "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

            Comment


              #16
              Wiki says yes

              0.999... - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...
              Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
              I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

              I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

              Comment


                #17
                To my mind reason 6 is the most intuitive.

                https://www.khanacademy.org/math/rec...ons-that-999-1
                Last edited by ZARDOZ; 3 October 2014, 09:01.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
                  To my mind reason 6 is the most intuitive.

                  https://www.khanacademy.org/math/rec...ons-that-999-1
                  I like Khan academy, a valuable resource.

                  She said '0.999 recurring' is not a real number. Infinity is not a real number. That's blasphemy that is.

                  Of course if I take 0.999 and stop three places after the decimal point I too can also prove that is equal to 1 algebraically. But that does not answer the question.

                  From that video the answer is, I cannot divide 0.99 recurring anymore than I could divide 0
                  "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                  Comment


                    #19
                    It can be considered equivalent to 1 but it is not equal to 1.
                    I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                      I like Khan academy, a valuable resource.

                      She said '0.999 recurring' is not a real number. Infinity is not a real number. That's blasphemy that is.

                      Of course if I take 0.999 and stop three places after the decimal point I too can also prove that is equal to 1 algebraically. But that does not answer the question.

                      From that video the answer is, I cannot divide 0.99 recurring anymore than I could divide 0
                      You can divide 0

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X