August 2014 Warmest on record, globally

[Old Greg]

Who cares. I would be 137 by then.

I think buying a house in LLandudno (basically a flood plain) was a mistake. Snowdon would have been better.

And on ex wife number 43, still paying back HMRC.

[Old Greg]

The argument gets stripped to that because thats what made the headlines. BIG headlines
and thats what he wanted.

Where were the big headlines?

[EternalOptimist]

Where were the big headlines?

who do you get to wipe your bum OG ?

try using your noggin. that thing that keeps your ears apart

[Old Greg]

who do you get to wipe your bum OG ?

try using your noggin. that thing that keeps your ears apart

The thing is EO, you talk a lot of nonsense from time to time, so I usually find it helpful to get you to corroborate what you say, or before we know it it's 2028 and Manhattan is underwater. No offence intended, matey.

Anyway, a bit off topic, but I found this interesting:

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As of 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[11] no scientific body of national or international standing rejected the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.

It's a good job we have so many people here who know better.

[d000hg]

who do you get to wipe your bum OG ?

try using your noggin. that thing that keeps your ears apart

That's a bit of a stretch.

[Old Greg]

I am glad to see that PJ is softening his position ^. I guess that makes him a 'luke warmer' rather than a catastrophist.

I wonder if he still believes in Hansens prediction that the West side would be under water by 2028 ? That would a bit of a catastrophe, wouldn't it ? 10 feet of water in 14 years.
wow.

What would be really interesting, EO, just to show how you like to play things with a straight bat, is if you could advise as to where you got the West side underwater by 2028 story from.

[EternalOptimist]

Anyway, a bit off topic, but I found this interesting:

Scientific opinion on climate change - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



It's a good job we have so many people here who know better.

no offence taken. But you are displaying a fair amount of naivety and ignorance here.
no one has ever disputed that humans are affecting the climate, that the green house effect is real. Producing millions of journals that say the same is meaningless.

What the sceptics say is that the effect is so tiny its worth ignoring.

Most scientists would agree that if you peed into the ocean, sea levels would rise
anyone with common sense would say, so what ?

[Old Greg]

no offence taken. But you are displaying a fair amount of naivety and ignorance here.
no one has ever disputed that humans are affecting the climate, that the green house effect is real. Producing millions of journals that say the same is meaningless.

So, EO, if I am the naive and ignorant one, how do you square:

no one has ever disputed that humans are affecting the climate, that the green house effect is real.

With:

Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections
Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes
Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[EternalOptimist]

What would be really interesting, EO, just to show how you like to play things with a straight bat, is if you could advise as to where you got the West side underwater by 2028 story from.

it was discussed in many places
try this one

[Old Greg]

it was discussed in many places
try this one

So do you believe that reflects Hansen's views or position?