• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Was the Scotland vote rigged?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
    Here goes:

    Age Range - Sample

    16-17 - 14
    18-24 - 84
    25-34 - 263
    35-44 - 384
    45-54 - 415
    55-64 - 399
    65+ - 488

    Go on, admit you are wrong on this one. ;-)
    Wrong about what? Someone asked a question and I answered with a link to the only data I've seen. I wasn't trying to make a point.

    Comment


      Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
      Here goes:

      Age Range - Sample

      16-17 - 14
      18-24 - 84
      25-34 - 263
      35-44 - 384
      45-54 - 415
      55-64 - 399
      65+ - 488

      Go on, admit you are wrong on this one. ;-)
      Now show it as a percentage of the people who voted in that range.

      HTH

      Comment


        Originally posted by Unix View Post
        Now show it as a percentage of the people who voted in that range.

        HTH
        Did you want margins of error as well?

        Comment


          Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
          Here goes:

          Age Range - Sample

          16-17 - 14
          18-24 - 84
          25-34 - 263
          35-44 - 384
          45-54 - 415
          55-64 - 399
          65+ - 488

          Go on, admit you are wrong on this one. ;-)


          With a degree in Economics and Maths and a PhD in math modelling, all I can say is that the sampling here doesn't really add too much in the lower age ranges 16-24. 16-17, in particular, is highly spurious and would really require a much larger sample size.

          If you think that you can draw any conclusions from these figures then you're really bonkers. You would really need a larger sample.

          Comment


            Originally posted by jemb View Post
            With a degree in Economics and Maths and a PhD in math modelling, all I can say is that the sampling here doesn't really add too much in the lower age ranges 16-24. 16-17, in particular, is highly spurious and would really require a much larger sample size.

            If you think that you can draw any conclusions from these figures then you're really bonkers. You would really need a larger sample.
            I can confirm this.

            Comment


              I spoke with a conservative friend of mine at the masonic hall today. I asked him about the vote being rigged and he just winked and said that it was all taken care of. I am left in no doubt now that the yes won and it was only the actions of him and his friends that has guaranteed the union's survival.

              Comment


                Originally posted by jemb View Post
                With a degree in Economics and Maths and a PhD in math modelling
                Helloo sas

                Comment


                  Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                  Helloo sas
                  Busted!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by jemb View Post
                    With a degree in Economics and Maths and a PhD in math modelling...

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                      So you have a better insight into extrapolating from the sample size of 16 to 17 year olds. Please share.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X