• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Scotland is the first country to vote against its own independence

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    The embarrassing thing is that even in the 21st century nationalists are able to win over a large chunk of the population and got close to winding back the clock 300 years. At least UKIP only want to go back to the 1950s.
    There's a bit of a paradox in there. The opposite of nationalism would be individual sovereignty, and a smaller independent nation would be the first step on the path to that state.

    it strikes me that one is more likely to be a nationalist if they prefer not to wind the clock back 300 years.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by GazCol View Post
      I agree; that's why it should have been open to all residents of the UK, as per my sentence above the one you quoted.
      That would have saved William Wallace the bother of getting is heed chopped off. If he'd have known that it was proper for the English got to decide if they should be free or not, I'm sure he wouldn't have bothered getting out of bed.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by tomtomagain View Post
        We can discuss this again further at the next independence referendum, sometime around 2044.
        Yes I was just thinking "Why did I post that?". It's done. Over. In the ground. Pushing up the daisies. Got to meet its maker. It is an ex-referendum.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
          There's a bit of a paradox in there. The opposite of nationalism would be individual sovereignty, and a smaller independent nation would be the first step on the path to that state.

          it strikes me that one is more likely to be a nationalist if they prefer not to wind the clock back 300 years.
          Individual sovereignty? You mean everyone is their own country?

          Interesting idea. It means I could stand in my own election, though I'm not sure I'd vote for myself. I don't trust me to deliver on my promises.
          Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
            That would have saved William Wallace the bother of getting is heed chopped off. If he'd have known that it was proper for the English got to decide if they should be free or not, I'm sure he wouldn't have bothered getting out of bed.
            Ah, so you checked the box marked 'Freedom', rather than 'Yes'.

            Should Scotland be an independent country was a question pertinent to everybody in the UK, not just those that happened to live in Scotland at the time of the referendum. I think it's likely Yes would have won, had it included a vote from everybody in the UK. Given how good you are at exporting your drug & alcohol addicted south, I think it would even have been a landslide victory.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
              You mean everyone is their own country?
              No

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by GazCol View Post
                Ah, so you checked the box marked 'Freedom', rather than 'Yes'.

                Should Scotland be an independent country was a question pertinent to everybody in the UK, not just those that happened to live in Scotland at the time of the referendum.
                Independence, in this instance, is a misnomer. It was a Scottish initiative and was rooted in a desire for national sovereignty - self-determination.
                While one affects the degree to which the other might exist, independence and sovereignty are two very different things.

                I'd like to have seen it happen, even though I think it'd have been painful in the short term (what with the Scots largely being raving socialists - unless I'm misjudging them).

                Comment


                  #48
                  Our EU masters speak....

                  EU's De Gucht admits feared Scots 'cataclysm' for Europe | Reuters

                  Scottish independence would have been "cataclysmic" for Europe, spurring separatism elsewhere and creating an "ungovernable" continent of rival nationalisms, says trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht, a Belgian liberal politician, of Flemish origin.

                  Speaking to Belgium's VRT radio, he confided that he had feared a "yes" vote, saying: "If it had happened in Scotland, I think it would have been a political landslide on the scale of the break-up of the Soviet Union", adding: "It would have been cataclysmic for Europe. That was what I feared".

                  "A Europe driven by self-determination of peoples ... is ungovernable because you'd have dozens of entities but areas of policy for which you need unanimity or a very large majority ... Moreover it's about countries, or parts of former countries, that would behave in a very nationalistic way".
                  Sounds like the EU had something pretty nasty lined up for Scotland if they'd dared to vote yes....

                  Comment


                    #49
                    ...

                    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
                    Our EU masters speak....



                    Sounds like the EU had something pretty nasty lined up for Scotland if they'd dared to vote yes....
                    Sounds more like they were pooping themselves at the prospect of the gravy train hitting the buffers and coming to a complete stop. Wherever would they all get real jobs?

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Flashman View Post
                      Our EU masters speak....
                      Sounds like the EU had something pretty nasty lined up for Scotland if they'd dared to vote yes....
                      Not surprised.

                      If you looked at how many separatist movements there were in Europe you could see that they would drag their heels about Scotland entering any of the economic areas.
                      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X