• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Nobody on here bothered by ISIS?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Maybe Tony could be sent in to spread a bit of peace and love?

    Things can only get better!


    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
      Maybe Tony could be sent in to bulk up his bank account some more?

      Things can only get better!



      FTFY
      ǝןqqıʍ

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by Avalonia View Post
        Nuking the site from orbit is a plan, unfortunately the mother ship is already infected.
        As Islam is effectively a human virus, after making a colony of atheists on another planet that's not a bad plan....
        Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

        No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
          As Islam is effectively a human virus, after making a colony of atheists on another planet that's not a bad plan....
          Statism is the virus. Islam just happens to be the standard under which this zombie marches.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
            Statism is the virus. Islam just happens to be the standard under which this zombie marches.
            Or, states and religions are types of 'in groups' that humans form. People want to be part of a group; the state is a geographical form of group that includes members who supposedly have something in common, but may actually have almost nothing to do with each other, but it allows exclusion of others, i.e. 'foreigners'. Religion is similar; it brings together people who may actually have no cause to do anything together, but then allows them exclude others, like Sunnis excluding their out groups, the Shi'ites and vice versa, or excluding the Yazidis, believers excluding infidels, and so on and so forth. The state and the religion are two aspects of the same group forming behaviour of humans, and both have their positive and negative aspects. In some ways I find patriotism and nationalism similar to religion and serving the same urges. Although, if pushed, I'd rather spend an afternoon in the company of Alex Salmond than with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Although, if pushed, I'd rather spend an afternoon in the company of Alex Salmond than with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
              The worst you could fear is he'd drone on about independence, e could be easily placated with a deep fried mars bar
              vs
              The risk of being beheaded because they're bored and their live feed of Eastenders isn't working
              Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

              No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View Post
                The worst you could fear is he'd drone on about independence, e could be easily placated with a deep fried mars bar
                vs
                The risk of being beheaded because they're bored and their live feed of Eastenders isn't working

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Or, states and religions are types of 'in groups' that humans form. People want to be part of a group; the state is a geographical form of group that includes members who supposedly have something in common, but may actually have almost nothing to do with each other, but it allows exclusion of others, i.e. 'foreigners'. Religion is similar; it brings together people who may actually have no cause to do anything together, but then allows them exclude others, like Sunnis excluding their out groups, the Shi'ites and vice versa, or excluding the Yazidis, believers excluding infidels, and so on and so forth. The state and the religion are two aspects of the same group forming behaviour of humans, and both have their positive and negative aspects. In some ways I find patriotism and nationalism similar to religion and serving the same urges. Although, if pushed, I'd rather spend an afternoon in the company of Alex Salmond than with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
                  I cant help disagreeing with this. Groups are formed by people with common values. Thats why I get on better with an immigrant developer from bongo bongo land than I do with the local chavs. Some of these blokes can hardly speak any English but I feel that I have known them all my life, whilst the scrounging chavs are pure scum.
                  Sometimes the values are religious beliefs, but either way , there is only one thing that can be done - make sure we have the biggest baddest military that we can afford. And back them up every way we can. We have to make sure that their thugs are scared of our thugs
                  (\__/)
                  (>'.'<)
                  ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                    I cant help disagreeing with this. Groups are formed by people with common values. Thats why I get on better with an immigrant developer from bongo bongo land than I do with the local chavs. Some of these blokes can hardly speak any English but I feel that I have known them all my life, whilst the scrounging chavs are pure scum.
                    I think actually you're agreeing.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      I think actually you're agreeing.
                      I dont know. 'in groups' and 'out group' indicate a fashion
                      more like gangs. transient as opposed to core values
                      (\__/)
                      (>'.'<)
                      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X