World war 3 now imminent

[Zigenare]

Can’t tell from your post if you mean Iran or the USA...

I was going to post "Don't be a prick all your life.", then I realised who the poster was.

[GhostofTarbera]

Ohhhh my, looks like it was official visit by invite by Iraq prime minister

Big no no in diplomatic circles


Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum

[darmstadt]

[ladymuck]

Team America: World Police

[meridian]

I was going to post "Don't be a prick all your life.", then I realised who the poster was.

You don’t think America has ever covertly funded terrorism in advance of its own political interests?

How cute, and how naive.

[Zigenare]

You don’t think America has ever covertly funded terrorism in advance of its own political interests?

How cute, and how naive.

Whataboutery at its best, well done.

[AtW]

You don’t think America has ever covertly funded terrorism in advance of its own political interests?

You can say that in UK or USA, these are free countries where people can have different opinions, go try how Iran will work out for you.

For that reason alone anybody sane should be on US/UK side, regardless of some of the shady things that both countries did in the past.

[meridian]

You can say that in UK or USA, these are free countries where people can have different opinions, go try how Iran will work out for you.

For that reason alone anybody sane should be on US/UK side, regardless of some of the shady things that both countries did in the past.

As you rightly point out, people can have different opinions.

It’s quite possible to “be on the side” of the U.K./US and yet still be critical of some of their decisions. “Being on their side” doesn’t need to mean “be an approving lapdog”.

[meridian]

Whataboutery at its best, well done.

Do keep up.

Your attempt an an insulting post quoted my response to the post from Xoggoth about terrorism. No whataboutery involved, there’s a clear linear thread.

[Zigenare]

As you rightly point out, people can have different opinions.

It’s quite possible to “be on the side” of the U.K./US and yet still be critical of some of their decisions. “Being on their side” doesn’t need to mean “be an approving lapdog”.

Even if one does approve?