Originally posted by blacjac
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contractors claiming benefits?
Collapse
X
-
Ah OK, TIL. I assumed they were equivalent. Much easier to just get YourCo to pay or issue vouchers IMO. For the record, I'm not a fan of claiming benefits just because you're on an artificially low salary. Having your cake and eating it spring to mind... -
Absolutely. Can't factor stupidity in to the rules unfortunately. Also seems a tad unfair you pay in all your life and can't claim but someone that does f'all expects to get it. We could go in to them breeding more offspring who expect the same yadda yadda but that's for another thread.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostBut the same still applies. Someone can earn £1 million blow it all on booze, drugs, and women and then claim JSA. Someone who works hard to save, does without but saves £20K will be told they can't claim a bean. Bit unfair.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Devil's other advocate: SHE owns shares in a company that has assets, and a net worth.Originally posted by jmo21 View PostDevils advocate....
SHE doesn't have savings.
The company has savings.
We are always quick to point out it is the companies money until withdrawn and treating it as such is an absolute rule and you are always one of the first to point that out to newbies when they are talking about "their money"
We do not know what she is doing with that money, could really be building her business, aiming to hire someone soon etc.
Is it likely? probably not.
Should we rush to judge and say it is immoral? I'm not convinced.
If, in the next tax year, she starts paying out divvies "normally", pay all appropriate tax, and doesn't claim these benefits, she will have done nothing wrong.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment