Originally posted by blacjac
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contractors claiming benefits?
Collapse
X
-
Ah OK, TIL. I assumed they were equivalent. Much easier to just get YourCo to pay or issue vouchers IMO. For the record, I'm not a fan of claiming benefits just because you're on an artificially low salary. Having your cake and eating it spring to mind... -
Absolutely. Can't factor stupidity in to the rules unfortunately. Also seems a tad unfair you pay in all your life and can't claim but someone that does f'all expects to get it. We could go in to them breeding more offspring who expect the same yadda yadda but that's for another thread.Originally posted by psychocandy View PostBut the same still applies. Someone can earn £1 million blow it all on booze, drugs, and women and then claim JSA. Someone who works hard to save, does without but saves £20K will be told they can't claim a bean. Bit unfair.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Devil's other advocate: SHE owns shares in a company that has assets, and a net worth.Originally posted by jmo21 View PostDevils advocate....
SHE doesn't have savings.
The company has savings.
We are always quick to point out it is the companies money until withdrawn and treating it as such is an absolute rule and you are always one of the first to point that out to newbies when they are talking about "their money"
We do not know what she is doing with that money, could really be building her business, aiming to hire someone soon etc.
Is it likely? probably not.
Should we rush to judge and say it is immoral? I'm not convinced.
If, in the next tax year, she starts paying out divvies "normally", pay all appropriate tax, and doesn't claim these benefits, she will have done nothing wrong.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Comment