• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Agency not paying invoice

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Hmmm. Hypothetically speaking, what are the contractor's options in the event that there is a legitimate debt being unpaid and and an umbrella company which refuses to take action against the agency?
    Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
      Hmmm. Hypothetically speaking, what are the contractor's options in the event that there is a legitimate debt being unpaid and and an umbrella company which refuses to take action against the agency?
      I haven't read it all but I think this article covers that situation.

      Contractors' Questions: Is my umbrella in breach of contract? :: Contractor UK
      'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by CoolCat View Post
        this is one of the biggest problems with using an umbrella, you cannot fight if they dont want to.

        many umbrellas contract their contractors for only minimum wage per hour, and all other payments are "bonus" if and only if the end client and agency pays their invoice. so even if you took the umbrella to tribunal or court you would likely only get minimum wages per hour. since contract between umbrella and agency, and between agency and end client, is little to do with you (in law) you cannot really push those fights.
        Despite the contractual terms it would still make sense to initiate a claim through an employment tribunal IMHO.

        It costs nothing and is very straight forward to do online without needing a solicitor. The umbrella must respond within a certain period or it goes to default judgement. You can still be negotiating during this period and right up to the hearing date, but the umbrella have more incentive to get it sorted - not least for the time and effort involved of attending a tribunal, but there's also no guarantee a Judge would uphold the contract totally in their favour.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Wanderer View Post
          Hmmm. Hypothetically speaking, what are the contractor's options in the event that there is a legitimate debt being unpaid and and an umbrella company which refuses to take action against the agency?
          The debt is to the umbrella company who in turn have a debt to the contractor - if there is legitimate liability then the umbrella company should pursue the agency
          Connect with me on LinkedIn

          Follow us on Twitter.

          ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Contreras View Post
            Despite the contractual terms it would still make sense to initiate a claim through an employment tribunal IMHO.

            It costs nothing and is very straight forward to do online without needing a solicitor.
            It costs £160 up front, and then £230 due at the hearing.
            Originally posted by MaryPoppins
            I hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
              It costs £160 up front, and then £230 due at the hearing.
              Thanks for the correction. That's a recent development, since August, and not an unreasonable one IMHO. But if it helps to bring about a rapid resolution of the dispute then it's money well spent.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Contreras View Post
                Thanks for the correction. That's a recent development, since August, and not an unreasonable one IMHO. But if it helps to bring about a rapid resolution of the dispute then it's money well spent.
                Cheaper to do it via MCOL than a tribunal now

                Comment

                Working...
                X